JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 59: 1639-1656, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norton, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Petry, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norton, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Petry, H. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 59, Issue 6 1639-1656, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Contrast-sensitivity functions of W-, X-, and Y-like relay cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of bush baby, Galago crassicaudatus

T. T. Norton, V. A. Casagrande, G. E. Irvin, M. A. Sesma and H. M. Petry
Department of Physiological Optics, School of Optometry, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.

1. This paper represents a continuation of our effort to examine the relationship between the physiology of distinct classes of primate lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) cells and spatial vision. The present study focuses on modeling the contrast-sensitivity functions (CSFs) of separate LGN cell classes, examining differences in the CSFs of different classes of LGN cells and comparing the results with behaviorally defined CSFs. 2. CSFs to drifting sinusoidal gratings were obtained from single LGN relay cells in the nocturnal primate, Galago crassicaudatus. The CSFs of 14 X-like, 27 Y-like, and 6 W-like cells with standard center-surround organization were well fit by a difference of Gaussians (DOG) model with small residual errors (mean error per data point +/- SEM = 0.008 +/- 0.002). The larger residual errors shown by a few of the Y-like cells were not due to nonlinearity of spatial summation. 3. The CSFs of eight cells that appeared to have nonstandard center-surround organization (primarily, a silent, suppressive surround) were also well fit by the DOG model. 4. The DOG curves that best fitted the data differed considerably between the three groups. As a group, X-like cells had a small center mechanism (Rc = 0.19 degrees) with high sensitivity (Kc = 76.53) and a small, sensitive surround (Rs = 0.71 degrees; Ks = 5.50). These parameters produced CSFs with high cutoff frequencies (Vcutoff = 2.5 c/deg) and low peak sensitivities (CSpk = 6.1) that occurred at 0.8 c/deg. 5. Y-like cells had a large center mechanism (Rc = 0.46 degrees) with low sensitivity (Kc = 21.16) and a large, insensitive surround (Rs = 2.38 degrees; Ks = 0.81). These parameters produced CSFs with lower cutoff frequencies (Vcutoff = 1.2 c/deg) and higher peak sensitivities (CSpk = 12.5) that occurred at 0.2 c/deg. 6. The few W-like cells that responded to gratings well enough to determine a CSF were quite variable. As a group they had a large center mechanism (Rc = 0.38 degrees) with intermediate sensitivity (Kc = 34.55) and a surround with intermediate size and sensitivity (Rs = 1.59 degrees; Ks = 1.59). These produced CSFs with intermediate cutoffs (Vcutoff = 1.6 c/deg) and low peak sensitivities (CSpk = 5.0) occurring at 0.4 c/deg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. D. Lu and A. W. Roe
Optical Imaging of Contrast Response in Macaque Monkey V1 and V2
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2675 - 2695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. P. Sceniak, S. Chatterjee, and E. M. Callaway
Visual Spatial Summation in Macaque Geniculocortical Afferents
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3474 - 3484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Zhu and J. J. Zhu
Rapid Arrival and Integration of Ascending Sensory Information in Layer 1 Nonpyramidal Neurons and Tuft Dendrites of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons of the Neocortex
J. Neurosci., February 11, 2004; 24(6): 1272 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. S. Grubb and I. D. Thompson
Quantitative Characterization of Visual Response Properties in the Mouse Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3594 - 3607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. D. Van Hooser, J. A. F. Heimel, and S. B. Nelson
Receptive Field Properties and Laminar Organization of Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3398 - 3418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. G. Solomon, A. J. R. White, and P. R. Martin
Extraclassical Receptive Field Properties of Parvocellular, Magnocellular, and Koniocellular Cells in the Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J. Neurosci., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 338 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. P. O'Keefe, J. B. Levitt, D. C. Kiper, R. M. Shapley, and J. A. Movshon
Functional Organization of Owl Monkey Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 594 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. G. P. Rosa, V. A. Casagrande, T. Preuss, and J. H. Kaas
Visual Field Representation in Striate and Prestriate Cortices of a Prosimian Primate (Galago garnetti)
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 3193 - 3217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Hendry and T Yoshioka
A neurochemically distinct third channel in the macaque dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus
Science, April 22, 1994; 264(5158): 575 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online