JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 59: 1736-1755, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kauer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kauer, J. S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 59, Issue 6 1736-1755, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of mitral/tufted cells to orthodromic and antidromic electrical stimulation in the olfactory bulb of the tiger salamander

K. A. Hamilton and J. S. Kauer
Department of Neurosurgery, Anatomy, New England Medical Center, Tufts Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.

1. Responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the olfactory nerve and olfactory tracts were analyzed in 46 output cells of the salamander olfactory bulb, in vivo. Labeling of several cells with horseradish peroxidase indicated that they were mitral and/or tufted neurons. The responses contained reproducible sequences of depolarizing and hyperpolarizing potentials, which changed with increases in stimulus intensity. 2. Stimulation of the nerve with intensities subthreshold for evoking spikes in the recorded cell resulted in a small depolarization followed by a period of hyperpolarization, during which spontaneous spikes were suppressed. With suprathreshold stimulus intensities, a single spike or often a burst of spikes was evoked, followed by a complex prolonged hyperpolarization. When full spikes were blocked by injecting hyperpolarizing current through the recording electrode, an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) with two major components and sometimes a fast prepotential were observed at the beginning of the response. Amplitudes of the EPSP and hyperpolarization increased with graded increases in stimulus intensity. In tests with paired stimulus volleys, spike generation was inhibited for at least 1 s and often for several seconds during the hyperpolarization. 3. Stimulation of the tracts with intensities subthreshold for evoking spikes in the recorded cell resulted in a complex prolonged hyperpolarization. With suprathreshold stimulus intensities, a single spike was evoked, followed by a similar period of hyperpolarization. When full spikes were blocked by injecting hyperpolarizing current through the recording electrode, a small antidromic spike, presumably generated in the axon or initial segment, was often observed. Amplitude of the hyperpolarization increased with graded increases in stimulus intensity. In tests with paired volleys, generation of a full antidromic spike was inhibited for a period that usually began 20-30 ms, following the spike evoked by the conditioning stimulus and lasted 100-500 ms. Full antidromic spikes were evoked prior to the period of inhibition and small antidromic spikes were evoked during the period. 4. The mean latencies of single evoked spikes or the first spikes of bursts decreased from 22 to 17 ms with increases in the intensity of nerve stimulation and from 7 to 6 ms with increases in the intensity of tract stimulation. Only decreases in orthodromic latency were significant at P less than or equal to 0.05, as determined by one-sided t tests between the means of responses subdivided according to response pattern and relative stimulus intensity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Egger, K. Svoboda, and Z. F. Mainen
Dendrodendritic Synaptic Signals in Olfactory Bulb Granule Cells: Local Spine Boost and Global Low-Threshold Spike
J. Neurosci., April 6, 2005; 25(14): 3521 - 3530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Mellon Jr.
Convergence of Multimodal Sensory Input Onto Higher-Level Neurons of the Crayfish Olfactory Pathway
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 3043 - 3055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Mellon Jr. and C. J. Wheeler
Coherent Oscillations in Membrane Potential Synchronize Impulse Bursts in Central Olfactory Neurons of the Crayfish
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1999; 81(3): 1231 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. A. Christensen and J. G. Hildebrand
Coincident Stimulation With Pheromone Components Improves Temporal Pattern Resolution in Central Olfactory Neurons
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1997; 77(2): 775 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. Laurent and H. Davidowitz
Encoding of Olfactory Information with Oscillating Neural Assemblies
Science, September 23, 1994; 265(5180): 1872 - 1875.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online