JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 59: 1770-1782, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 59, Issue 6 1770-1782, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Spatial patterns of olfactory bulb single-unit responses to learned olfactory cues in young rats

D. A. Wilson and M. Leon
Department of Psychobiology, University of California, Irvine 92717.

1. Neonatal rat pups were classically conditioned to an odor stimulus from postnatal day 1 (PN1) to PN18. Tactile stimulation (stroking) was used as the unconditioned stimulus. On PN19, mitral/tufted cell single-unit responses to the conditioned odor were examined in both conditioned and control pups. Recordings were made from mitral/tufted cells in two regions of the olfactory bulb: 1) an area typically associated with focal [14C]2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) uptake in response to the conditioned odor and 2) an area distant from focal 2-DG uptake to the conditioned odor. Animals were anesthetized with urethane and were naturally respiring during the single-unit recording procedure. 2. Changes in mitral/tufted cell firing rate in response to odors in both bulbar regions and all training groups were classified as either excitatory, suppressive, or no response. This response classification was used to compare response patterns to the conditioned odor between bulbar regions and training groups. 3. Classical conditioning selectively modified the response patterns of mitral/tufted cells to the conditioned odor when those cells were associated with regions of focal 2-DG uptake for that odor. Mitral/tufted cells demonstrated significantly more suppressive and fewer excitatory responses to the conditioned odor than cells in control pups. Response patterns to a novel odor were not similarly modified. 4. Response patterns of mitral/tufted cells distant from the focal region of 2-DG uptake to the conditioned odor were not modified by conditioning compared with control pups. 5. The difference in response pattern between cells in the 2-DG focus and cells distant to the 2-DG focus was apparent within 500 ms of the stimulus onset. Given the respiratory rate of these pups (2 Hz), these data suggest that the modified response pattern occurred on the first inhalation of the learned odor. 6. These data demonstrate that both spatial and temporal patterns of olfactory bulb output neuron activity are used in the coding of olfactory information in the bulb. Furthermore, these spatial/temporal response patterns can be modified by early learning.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
A. M. McNamara, P. D. Magidson, C. Linster, D. A. Wilson, and T. A. Cleland
Distinct neural mechanisms mediate olfactory memory formation at different timescales
Learn. Mem., February 22, 2008; 15(3): 117 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. J. Tyler, G. C. Petzold, S. K. Pal, and V. N. Murthy
Experience-Dependent Modification of Primary Sensory Synapses in the Mammalian Olfactory Bulb
J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9427 - 9438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Laaris, A. Puche, and M. Ennis
Complementary Postsynaptic Activity Patterns Elicited in Olfactory Bulb by Stimulation of Mitral/Tufted and Centrifugal Fiber Inputs to Granule Cells
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 296 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
K. Shionoya, S. Moriceau, L. Lunday, C. Miner, T. L. Roth, and R. M. Sullivan
Development switch in neural circuitry underlying odor-malaise learning
Learn. Mem., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 801 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. S. P. Magavi, B. D. Mitchell, O. Szentirmai, B. S. Carter, and J. D. Macklis
Adult-Born and Preexisting Olfactory Granule Neurons Undergo Distinct Experience-Dependent Modifications of their Olfactory Responses In Vivo
J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10729 - 10739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
D. A. Wilson, A. R. Best, and R. M. Sullivan
Plasticity in the Olfactory System: Lessons for the Neurobiology of Memory
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2004; 10(6): 513 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
R. M. Sullivan and D. A. Wilson
Molecular Biology Of Early Olfactory Memory
Learn. Mem., January 1, 2003; 10(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Q. Yuan, C. W. Harley, J. H. McLean, and T. Knopfel
Optical Imaging of Odor Preference Memory in the Rat Olfactory Bulb
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 3156 - 3159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. L. Schaefer, D. A. Young, and D. Restrepo
Olfactory Fingerprints for Major Histocompatibility Complex-Determined Body Odors
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2001; 21(7): 2481 - 2487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. A. Wilson
Habituation of Odor Responses in the Rat Anterior Piriform Cortex
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1998; 79(3): 1425 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online