JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 60: 1198-1214, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Botterman, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cope, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Botterman, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cope, T. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 60, Issue 4 1198-1214, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Motor-unit stimulation patterns during fatiguing contractions of constant tension

B. R. Botterman and T. C. Cope
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.

1. Through computer feedback control, muscle-unit tension was maintained by altering the stimulation rate of a functionally isolated motor axon. The required stimulation patterns and fatigue properties of motor units from the flexor carpi radialis (FCR), flexor digitorum longus (FDL), and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles of the cat were studied when tension was maintained or "clamped" at a constant average level (25% of maximum tetanic tension). 2. In each muscle, two distinct stimulation patterns were observed during constant-tension contractions, one associated with slow-twitch units and the other with fast-twitch units. Once target tension was reached, slow-twitch units required fairly constant rates in order to maintain a constant force, whereas fast-twitch units displayed a marked decline in rate during the early phases of the contraction, averaging between 42 and 54% for the three muscles. The decline in rate most likely represented potentiation of the contractile response and slowing of contractile speed. In general, slow-twitch units responded with lower mean rates (approximately 14 pps less), averaged over the course of the contraction, than fast-twitch units. 3. For fast-twitch units of each muscle, resistance to fatigue varied continuously and over a wide range. The duration that tension could be maintained at 25% of maximum, defined as endurance time, ranged between 16 and 2063 s. No categorization of fast-twitch units into groups could be made on the basis of endurance time. Of the 5 slow-twitch units followed beyond 2700 s, only one failed to maintain tension during the observation period. 4. For hindlimb fast-twitch units, endurance was independent of the stimulation rate needed to maintain tension during the contraction. By contrast, there was a significant tendency for an inverse relation between endurance time and mean stimulation rate for FCR fast-twitch units. 5. Recovery of maximum tension was evaluated at 30 s, 1 min, 2 min, and 5 min following a constant-tension contraction. After a 5-min rest, fast-twitch units were able to produce an average of 80-85% of their maximum tetanic tension. By using the median endurance time (approximately 100 s) to divide the fast-twitch population into "low" and "high" endurance groups, recovery of tension was found not to be uniform among the two groups. High endurance units were able to recover a greater percentage of their original maximum tetanic tension. No difference was found between force recovery for low and high endurance units at 30 s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. L. Taylor and S. C. Gandevia
A comparison of central aspects of fatigue in submaximal and maximal voluntary contractions
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 542 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. C. Dean, L. M. Yates, and D. F. Collins
Turning on the central contribution to contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 170 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Klass, N. Guissard, and J. Duchateau
Limiting mechanisms of force production after repetitive dynamic contractions in human triceps surae
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2004; 96(4): 1516 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. S. Klein, C. L. Rice, T. D. Ivanova, and S. J. Garland
Changes in motor unit discharge rate are not associated with the amount of twitch potentiation in old men
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2002; 93(5): 1616 - 1621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
F. Abbate, A. J. Sargeant, P. W. L. Verdijk, and A. de Haan
Effects of high-frequency initial pulses and posttetanic potentiation on power output of skeletal muscle
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2000; 88(1): 35 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online