JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 60: 1369-1383, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wenstrup, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wenstrup, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, G. D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 60, Issue 4 1369-1383, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Binaural neurons in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus. I. Responses of 60-kHz EI units to dichotic sound stimulation

J. J. Wenstrup, Z. M. Fuzessery and G. D. Pollak
Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

1. Single-unit responses to closed-field, dichotic sound stimuli were obtained from EI neurons in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus; these neurons are excited by sound to the contralateral ear and inhibited by sound to the ipsilateral ear. All units were tuned to the 60-kHz component of the bat's sonar signal. The goal of the study was to describe basic features of the sensitivity to interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and sound intensity among an isofrequency population of EI neurons. The following paper describes how these features of IID sensitivity shape the response to free-field sounds. 2. Three features of IID sensitivity were considered. The inhibitory threshold (Figs. 1 and 2) described the IID at which inhibitory effects became pronounced; it was defined as the IID at which the excitatory response to contralateral sound was suppressed by 50%. Most units (68%) were inhibited at positive IID values, for which the ipsilateral (inhibitory) sound was more intense. The maximum inhibition (Figs. 1 and 3) described the strength of ipsilateral inhibition; it was defined as the percent that each unit was inhibited below its response to monaural stimulation of the contralateral ear. The majority of units (58%) were almost totally suppressed by a sufficiently intense ipsilateral sound. The IID range (Figs. 1 and 4) described the sharpness or slope of the IID cutoff; it was defined as the IID range over which the response changed from nearly unsuppressed (80% of maximum response) to near maximum suppression (20% of maximum response). Most units (71%) had IID ranges of less than or equal to 15 dB. 3. A significant correlation between the inhibitory threshold and the maximum inhibition (Fig. 5) among the sample of EI units suggests that some common neural mechanisms underlie these features of IID sensitivity. 4. The response of EI neurons to binaural stimuli was a function of sound intensity as well as IID (Fig. 7). In part, this resulted from intensity-dependent changes in properties of binaural inhibition. For most units, basic measures of IID sensitivity changed to a limited extent as the sound intensity changed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Davis, O. Lomakin, and M. J. Pesavento
Response Properties of Single Units in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus of Decerebrate Cats
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1475 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. Chase and E. D. Young
Limited Segregation of Different Types of Sound Localization Information among Classes of Units in the Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., August 17, 2005; 25(33): 7575 - 7585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Park, A. Klug, M. Holinstat, and B. Grothe
Interaural Level Difference Processing in the Lateral Superior Olive and the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 289 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Razak and Z. M. Fuzessery
Functional Organization of the Pallid Bat Auditory Cortex: Emphasis on Binaural Organization
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 72 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. M. Burger and G. D. Pollak
Reversible Inactivation of the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus Reveals Its Role in the Processing of Multiple Sound Sources in the Inferior Colliculus of Bats
J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4830 - 4843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. K. Samson, P. Barone, W. A. Irons, J. C. Clarey, P. Poirier, and T. J. Imig
Directionality Derived From Differential Sensitivity to Monaural and Binaural Cues in the Cat's Medial Geniculate Body
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1330 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. R. Mendelson and K. L. Grasse
Auditory Cortical Responses to the Interactive Effects of Interaural Intensity Disparities and Frequency
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2000; 10(1): 32 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Klug, E. E. Bauer, and G. D. Pollak
Multiple Components of Ipsilaterally Evoked Inhibition in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 593 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Davis, R. Ramachandran, and B. J. May
Single-Unit Responses in the Inferior Colliculus of Decerebrate Cats II. Sensitivity to Interaural Level Differences
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 164 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Delgutte, P. X. Joris, R. Y. Litovsky, and T. C. T. Yin
Receptive Fields and Binaural Interactions for Virtual-Space Stimuli in the Cat Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2833 - 2851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. P. Oswald, A. Klug, and T. J. Park
Interaural Intensity Difference Processing in Auditory Midbrain Neurons: Effects of a Transient Early Inhibitory Input
J. Neurosci., February 1, 1999; 19(3): 1149 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Park
IID Sensitivity Differs Between Two Principal Centers in the Interaural Intensity Difference Pathway: the LSO and the IC
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2416 - 2431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Yang and G. D. Pollak
Differential Response Properties to Amplitude Modulated Signals in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus of the Mustache Bat and the Roles of GABAergic Inhibition
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 324 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online