JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 60: 1779-1798, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, M. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 60, Issue 5 1779-1798, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise

M. C. Liberman
Department of Physiology, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.

1. Discharge properties of olivocochlear efferent neurons were measured in anesthetized cats. Previous studies of these neurons concentrated on monaural stimulation with tones and found sound-evoked discharge rates rarely exceeded 60 spikes/s (16, 20). In the present study, rates as high as 140 spikes/s were achieved by binaural stimulation and/or the addition of noise. Based on studies on the known effects of electrically stimulating the efferents such high rates of sound-evoked efferent activity probably have significant feedback effects on the auditory periphery. 2. Spontaneous discharge rate (SR) was weakly correlated with threshold among efferent neurons: those with SRs greater than 1 spikes/s were generally more sensitive than spontaneously inactive fibers. The discharge rate measured in the absence of acoustic stimulation was shown to be dependent on stimulation history: some units with zero SR became spontaneously active after several minutes of continuous noise stimulation. 3. For stimulation with monaural tones, efferent excitability varied with characteristic frequency (CF): units with CF less than 10 kHz tended to have lower thresholds, higher discharge rates, and shorter latencies than higher CF units. These differences could be minimized by the addition of broadband noise (see below). 4. When tones were presented to one ear at a time, most efferent units appeared monaural (91%), with roughly two-thirds excited by ipsilateral stimuli and one-third by contralateral stimuli. However, the effects of simultaneous stimulation of the two ears suggested that the great majority of efferent units have binaural inputs: the addition of opposite-ear noise or tones, which presented alone were not excitatory, typically enhanced the response to main-ear stimulation. This type of binaural facilitation was strongest among low-CF efferents when the opposite-ear stimuli were tones, and strongest among high-CF units when the opposite-ear stimulus was broadband noise. 5. The binaural facilitation seen using opposite-ear noise both lowered the threshold (by as much as 40 dB) and increased the discharge rate (by as much as 80%) to tones presented in the main ear. Significant facilitation was seen with noise levels as low as 25 dB SPL or tone levels as low as 30 dB SPL. In general, the weaker the response to monaural stimuli, the stronger the binaural facilitation. 6. The facilitatory effects of stimulation with continuous noise could outlast the stimulus. Persistent increases in efferent sensitivity were documented following 10-min exposures to broadband noise at 85-115 dB SPL.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Rajan
Contextual Modulation of Olivocochlear Pathway Effects on Loud Sound-Induced Cochlear Hearing Desensitization
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1977 - 1988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Groff and M. C. Liberman
Modulation of Cochlear Afferent Response by the Lateral Olivocochlear System: Activation Via Electrical Stimulation of the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3178 - 3200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Fujino and D. Oertel
Cholinergic Modulation of Stellate Cells in the Mammalian Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7372 - 7383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Rajan
Noise Priming and the Effects of Different Cochlear Centrifugal Pathways on Loud-Sound-Induced Hearing Loss
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1277 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Rajan
Unilateral Hearing Losses Alter Loud Sound-Induced Temporary Threshold Shifts and Efferent Effects in the Normal-Hearing Ear
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1257 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Rajan
Centrifugal Pathways Protect Hearing Sensitivity at the Cochlea in Noisy Environments That Exacerbate the Damage Induced by Loud Sound
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6684 - 6693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. F. Maison and M. C. Liberman
Predicting Vulnerability to Acoustic Injury with a Noninvasive Assay of Olivocochlear Reflex Strength
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2000; 20(12): 4701 - 4707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Yoshida, M. C. Liberman, M. C. Brown, and W. F. Sewell
Gentamicin Blocks Both Fast and Slow Effects of Olivocochlear Activation in Anesthetized Guinea Pigs
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3168 - 3174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. G. Kujawa and M. C. Liberman
Long-Term Sound Conditioning Enhances Cochlear Sensitivity
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 863 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Brown, S. G. Kujawa, and M. L. Duca
Single Olivocochlear Neurons in the Guinea Pig. I. Binaural Facilitation of Responses to High-Level Noise
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3077 - 3087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Brown, S. G. Kujawa, and M. C. Liberman
Single Olivocochlear Neurons in the Guinea Pig. II. Response Plasticity Due to Noise Conditioning
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3088 - 3097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. G. Kujawa and M. C. Liberman
Conditioning-Related Protection From Acoustic Injury: Effects of Chronic Deefferentation and Sham Surgery
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3095 - 3106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. L. da Costa, A. Chibois, J.-P. Erre, C. Blanchet, R. C. de Sauvage, and J.-M. Aran
Fast, Slow, and Steady-State Effects of Contralateral Acoustic Activation of the Medial Olivocochlear Efferent System in Awake Guinea Pigs: Action of Gentamicin
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1997; 78(4): 1826 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Fujino, K. Koyano, and H. Ohmori
Lateral and Medial Olivocochlear Neurons Have Distinct Electrophysiological Properties in the Rat Brain Slice
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1997; 77(5): 2788 - 2804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Maison, C. Micheyl, and L. Collet
Medial Olivocochlear Efferent System in Humans Studied With Amplitude-Modulated Tones
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1997; 77(4): 1759 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Dallos, D. Z. Z. He, X. Lin, I. Sziklai, S. Mehta, and B. N. Evans
Acetylcholine, Outer Hair Cell Electromotility, and the Cochlear Amplifier
J. Neurosci., March 15, 1997; 17(6): 2212 - 2226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online