JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 60: 1924-1945, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bloomfield, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bloomfield, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 60, Issue 6 1924-1945, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Postsynaptic potentials recorded in neurons of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus following electrical stimulation of the optic chiasm

S. A. Bloomfield and S. M. Sherman
Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-5230.

1. We recorded intracellularly from X and Y cells of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus and measured the postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) evoked from electrical stimulation of the optic chiasm. We used an in vivo preparation and computer averaged the PSPs to enhance their signal-to-noise ratio. 2. The vast majority (46 of 50) of our sample of X and Y cells responded to stimulation of the optic chiasm with an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) followed by an inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP); these were tentatively identified as relay cells. We quantified several parameters of these PSPs, including amplitude, latency, time to peak (i.e., rise time), and duration. 3. Among the relay cells, the latencies of both the EPSP and action potential evoked by optic chiasm stimulation were shorter in Y cells than in X cells. Furthermore, the difference between the latencies of the EPSP and action potential was shorter for Y cells than for X cells. This means that the EPSPs generated in Y cells reached threshold for generation of action potentials faster than did those in X cells. The EPSPs of Y cells also displayed larger amplitudes and faster rise times than did those in X cells, but neither of these distinctions was sufficient to explain the shorter latency difference between the EPSP and action potential for Y cells. 4. The EPSPs recorded in relay Y cells had longer durations than did those in relay X cells. Our data suggest that the subsequent IPSP actively terminates the EPSP, which, in turn, suggests that the time interval between EPSP and IPSP onsets is longer in Y cells than in X cells. Furthermore, we found that, for individual Y cells, the latency and duration of the evoked EPSP were inversely related. These observations lead to the conclusion that the latency of IPSPs activated from the optic chiasm is relatively constant among Y cells and thus independent of the EPSP latencies. Thus the excitation and inhibition produced in individual geniculate Y cells may originate from different populations of retinogeniculate axons. 5. The IPSPs recorded in geniculate relay cells following optic chiasm stimulation could be divided into three groups based on their durations. The majority of both X and Y cells showed short-duration IPSPs, whereas the remainder of Y cells displayed medium-duration IPSPs, and the remaining X cells displayed long-duration IPSPs. A positive correlation was seen between the time to peak and duration of these IPSPs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. E. Landisman and B. W. Connors
VPM and PoM Nuclei of the Rat Somatosensory Thalamus: Intrinsic Neuronal Properties and Corticothalamic Feedback
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2853 - 2865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
F. J Veredas, F. J Vico, and J.-M. Alonso
Factors determining the precision of the correlated firing generated by a monosynaptic connection in the cat visual pathway
J. Physiol., September 15, 2005; 567(3): 1057 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Deschenes, E. Timofeeva, and P. Lavallee
The Relay of High-Frequency Sensory Signals in the Whisker-to-Barreloid Pathway
J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6778 - 6787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Kara, J. S. Pezaris, S. Yurgenson, and R. C. Reid
The spatial receptive field of thalamic inputs to single cortical simple cells revealed by the interaction of visual and electrical stimulation
PNAS, December 10, 2002; 99(25): 16261 - 16266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
U. Hillenbrand and J. L. van Hemmen
Does Corticothalamic Feedback Control Cortical Velocity Tuning?
Neural Comput., February 1, 2001; 13(2): 327 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Gutierrez, C. L. Cox, J. Rinzel, and S. M. Sherman
Dynamics of Low-Threshold Spike Activation in Relay Neurons of the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2001; 21(3): 1022 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Peruzzi, E. Bartlett, P. H. Smith, and D. L. Oliver
A Monosynaptic GABAergic Input from the Inferior Colliculus to the Medial Geniculate Body in Rat
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1997; 17(10): 3766 - 3777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online