JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 60: 2000-2013, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baloh, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yee, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baloh, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yee, R. D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 60, Issue 6 2000-2013, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Eye movements induced by linear acceleration on a parallel swing

R. W. Baloh, K. Beykirch, V. Honrubia and R. D. Yee
Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine 90024.

1. Horizontal and vertical eye movements were induced in normal human subjects by sinusoidal linear acceleration on a parallel swing. The swing frequency was 0.3 Hz and the peak horizontal and vertical acceleration ranged from 0.17 to 0.48 and 0.03 to 0.34 g, respectively. Eye movements were recorded with the scleral search coil technique. 2. With the subjects seated in the dark to stimulate the otolith-ocular reflex, swing displacement along the interaural axis induced horizontal eye movements with a mean sensitivity to translation (ST) (peak eye velocity/peak swing velocity) of 3.8 to 4.7 degrees/m and a mean phase shift (eye velocity re swing velocity) of -152 to -160 degrees. Vertical eye movements had ST and phase values comparable to those of the horizontal eye movements. When the subjects sat facing forward so that the horizontal linear accelerations occurred in the occipitonasal axis, almost identical vertical but no consistent horizontal eye movements were induced. In each case the horizontal and vertical eye movements were proportional to the horizontal and vertical displacement of the swing. 3. With the subject seated in the light looking to an earth-fixed target (synergistic visual-vestibular interaction), the gain (peak eye velocity/peak target velocity) of induced eye movements was near 1, and the phase was compensatory (i.e., approximately -180 degrees) for all stimuli (even at target velocities at which the pursuit gain was less than 1). Subjects were able to suppress the otolith-ocular responses by fixating on a target attached to the swing. The ST decreased by an order of magnitude compared with measurements in the dark without a fixation target. 4. Subjects were able to augment the ST (horizontal and vertical) by imagining an earth-fixed target. Halving the distance of the imagined target approximately doubled the ST. 5. In two of three subjects tested, the ST measured with mental alerting in the dark adaptively increased (approximately doubled) after 20 min of continuous synergistic visual-vestibular interaction. The subject who did not show an adaptive increase in ST began with the highest value of the 10 normal subjects. 6. We conclude that during linear accelerations of the head the otolith signal is correctly interpreted as head movement and not rotation of the gravity vector. The otolith-ocular reflex interacts with the visual pursuit system to improve ocular stability during translational head movements.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-r. Tian, E. Mokuno, and J. L. Demer
Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex to Transient Surge Translation: Complex Geometric Response Ablated by Normal Aging
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2042 - 2054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Merfeld, S. Park, C. Gianna-Poulin, F. O. Black, and S. Wood
Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. I. Frequency Response of VOR and Perceptual Responses During Translation and Tilt
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 186 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. E. Angelaki
Eyes on Target: What Neurons Must do for the Vestibuloocular Reflex During Linear Motion
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 20 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. J. Bockisch, D. Straumann, and T. Haslwanter
Eye Movements During Multi-Axis Whole-Body Rotations
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 355 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Merfeld, L. H. Zupan, and C. A. Gifford
Neural Processing of Gravito-Inertial Cues in Humans. II. Influence of the Semicircular Canals During Eccentric Rotation
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 1648 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. D. Paige, L. Telford, S. H. Seidman, and G. R. Barnes
Human Vestibuloocular Reflex and Its Interactions With Vision and Fixation Distance During Linear and Angular Head Movement
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 2391 - 2404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. E. Angelaki
Three-Dimensional Organization of Otolith-Ocular Reflexes in Rhesus Monkeys. III. Responses to Translation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 680 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
U Schwarz, C Busettini, and F. Miles
Ocular responses to linear motion are inversely proportional to viewing distance
Science, September 22, 1989; 245(4924): 1394 - 1396.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online