JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 61: 15-31, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mizumori, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mizumori, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, C. A.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 61, Issue 1 15-31, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

A comparison of supramammillary and medial septal influences on hippocampal field potentials and single-unit activity

S. J. Mizumori, B. L. McNaughton and C. A. Barnes
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309.

1. A comparison was made between the influences of supramammillary (SUM) and medial septal (MS) nuclei on hippocampal physiology in Nembutal-anesthetized rats. Specifically, the effects of prestimulation of the SUM or MS on the perforant path-dentate field potential, on spontaneous activity of single units, and on perforant path-induced unit activation were assessed. Another series of experiments addressed the issue of whether the SUM and MS effects on the perforant path-dentate field response are independent. 2. Prestimulation of the SUM or MS significantly facilitated the perforant path-dentate population spike with no clear effect on the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) recorded in the subgranular zone of the dentate hilus. Prestimulation of either nucleus also reduced the threshold for spike onset. The major differences between the two spike facilitation effects were the magnitude of the change and possibly the optimal interstimulus intervals required to obtain the effects. 3. Acute transection of the ipsilateral column of fornix or dorsal fornix eliminated the SUM population spike facilitation effect. MS lesion or dorsal fornix/fimbria transection eliminated the MS spike facilitation effect. The MS lesion did not alter the effects of SUM prestimulation. Cingulum or medial forebrain bundle transection affected neither SUM- nor MS-mediated spike facilitation. Thus the SUM and MS influences on the dentate field response appear to be independent of one another. The relevant SUM afferents travel through the ipsilateral column of fornix and dorsal fornix, whereas MS afferents project through the dorsal fornix/fimbria. 4. Single units recorded in stratum granulosum (SG) were assessed with respect to several parameters. These included the mean firing rate, whether or not excitation occurred prior to the field population spike and at lower threshold, and whether or not a driven unit responded to a second perforant path stimulus delivered at short latency following the first (during the period of population spike depression). The latter parameter in particular appeared to separate SG cells into two classes. The cells that were not activated during the second field potential were classified as granule cells, whereas those that were activated were classified as basket cells. Based on this distinction, significant differences were also found between the two cell classes on the other parameters. In particular, cells classified as granule cells often had very low firing rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J.-L. Boulland, M. Jenstad, A. J. Boekel, F. G. Wouterlood, R. H. Edwards, J. Storm-Mathisen, and F. A. Chaudhry
Vesicular Glutamate and GABA Transporters Sort to Distinct Sets of Vesicles in a Population of Presynaptic Terminals
Cereb Cortex, May 22, 2008; (2008) bhn077v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Leibold, A. Gundlfinger, R. Schmidt, K. Thurley, D. Schmitz, and R. Kempter
Temporal compression mediated by short-term synaptic plasticity
PNAS, March 18, 2008; 105(11): 4417 - 4422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. Gundlfinger, C. Leibold, K. Gebert, M. Moisel, D. Schmitz, and R. Kempter
Differential modulation of short-term synaptic dynamics by long-term potentiation at mouse hippocampal mossy fibre synapses
J. Physiol., December 15, 2007; 585(3): 853 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. T. G. Hahn, B. Sakmann, and M. R. Mehta
Differential responses of hippocampal subfields to cortical up-down states
PNAS, March 20, 2007; 104(12): 5169 - 5174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Fuhs, S. R. VanRhoads, A. E. Casale, B. McNaughton, and D. S. Touretzky
Influence of Path Integration Versus Environmental Orientation on Place Cell Remapping Between Visually Identical Environments
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2603 - 2616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. M. A. Pennartz, E. Lee, J. Verheul, P. Lipa, C. A. Barnes, and B. L. McNaughton
The Ventral Striatum in Off-Line Processing: Ensemble Reactivation during Sleep and Modulation by Hippocampal Ripples
J. Neurosci., July 21, 2004; 24(29): 6446 - 6456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. L. Colgin, E. A. Kramar, C. M. Gall, and G. Lynch
Septal Modulation of Excitatory Transmission in Hippocampus
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2358 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. P. Wiebe and U. V. Staubli
Recognition Memory Correlates of Hippocampal Theta Cells
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2001; 21(11): 3955 - 3967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Kimura and C. Pavlides
Long-Term Potentiation/Depotentiation Are Accompanied by Complex Changes in Spontaneous Unit Activity in the Hippocampus
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1894 - 1906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. P. Wiebe and U. V. Staubli
Dynamic Filtering of Recognition Memory Codes in the Hippocampus
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1999; 19(23): 10562 - 10574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. S. Hollrigel, S. T. Ross, and I. Soltesz
Temporal Patterns and Depolarizing Actions of Spontaneous GABAA Receptor Activation in Granule Cells of the Early Postnatal Dentate Gyrus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 2340 - 2351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. N. Lieberman and I. Mody
Substance P Enhances NMDA Channel Function in Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus Granule Cells
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Samsonovich and B. L. McNaughton
Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping in a Continuous Attractor Neural Network Model
J. Neurosci., August 1, 1997; 17(15): 5900 - 5920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online