JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 61: 382-390, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bai, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Slaughter, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bai, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Slaughter, M. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 61, Issue 2 382-390, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

Effects of baclofen on transient neurons in the mudpuppy retina: electrogenic and network actions

S. H. Bai and M. M. Slaughter
Department of Biophysical Sciences, School of Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo 14214.

1. Baclofen increases transient light responses of amacrine and ganglion cells despite acting as a classical inhibitory transmitter to both hyperpolarize and shunt these cells. 2. This effect seems to occur at the level of the inner retina and appears not to be due to an additional input from bipolar cells. 3. In some transient cells baclofen increases the total amplitude of the light response but does not change the peak potential of the light evoked EPSP. In these cells, the baclofen-induced enhancement can be accounted for by an increase in driving force of the excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) resulting from the hyperpolarization. 4. However, in other cells the peak of the light response after baclofen application is greater, which cannot be accounted for by a change in driving force. This effect of baclofen can be mimicked by a blockers of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine, suggesting that in these cells baclofen's enhancement is due in part to network effects resulting in a removal of sustained inhibition. 5. Therefore, the paradoxical effect of an inhibitory transmitter producing an enhancement of synaptic responses seems due to at least two mechanisms. 6. The results indicate that some transient cells receive significant tonic inhibition which limits their response amplitude in a push-pull type mechanism, but other cells are not under this inhibitory control process.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online