JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 61: 447-455, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Poppele, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Poppele, R. E.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 61, Issue 2 447-455, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

Components of the responses of a population of DSCT neurons determined from single-unit recordings

C. E. Osborn and R. E. Poppele
Laboratory of Neurophysiology, University of Minnestoa, Minneapolis 55455.

1. Impulse activity of single units belonging to the dorsal spinocerebella tract (DSCT) was recorded in response to electrical stimulation of peripheral muscle nerves at group I intensities. The responses for 187 units were determined using a spike train analysis technique that facilitates the comparison of poststimulus response time course across units (response probability function, RPF; 16). 2. The poststimulus changes in impulse activity were represented in the waveform of the RPF. Principal component analysis was used to determine the component waveforms that were common to the responses across units. The analysis showed that there were a few waveforms that dominated the majority of the responses (85% of the total variability was accounted for by five principal component waveforms). 3. A cluster analysis based on three principal component waveforms revealed seven major groups of responses according to the patterns of their poststimulus activity. These response types were composed of different combinations of short- or long-latency excitation and inhibition. The same clusters were formed regardless of response amplitude or the source of the stimulus. 4. The responses were characterized by three general features, revealed by the first three principal components. The primary feature was the sign of the response, either mostly excitatory or inhibitory. The second feature was a distinction between a short- (up to 15 ms) and long- (approximately 30 ms) latency to peak response, and the third feature was the appearance of two separate phases of opposite sign in some of the responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. d'Avossa, G. L. Shulman, and M. Corbetta
Identification of Cerebral Networks by Classification of the Shape of BOLD Responses
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 360 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. Bosco and R. E. Poppele
Proprioception From a Spinocerebellar Perspective
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 539 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online