JN AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 62: 680-693, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dietz, V.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dietz, V.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, W.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 62, Issue 3 680-693, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

Interlimb coordination of leg-muscle activation during perturbation of stance in humans

V. Dietz, G. A. Horstmann and W. Berger
Department of Clinical Neurology and Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

1. Electromyographic (EMG) responses were recorded in both legs, along with corresponding joint movements, after uni- and bilateral perturbations during stance on a treadmill with split belts. Displacements were directed forward, backward, or in opposing directions. They were induced by randomly timed ramp impulses at one of four different rates of treadmill acceleration. 2. Unilateral perturbations directed backward were followed by a bilateral gastrocnemius-EMG response, forward-directed perturbations by a bilateral tibialis anterior-EMG response. The amplitude of these responses was dependent on the rate of treadmill acceleration. Relative to the response of the displaced leg, the amplitude of the EMG response on the nondisplaced side was smaller when a gastrocnemius EMG response was induced, and about equal when the tibialis anterior muscle was activated. The onset latencies were shorter on the displaced side (displaced leg 75-96 ms, non-displaced leg 93-112 ms). 3. Bilateral perturbations in one direction were followed by larger EMG responses in both legs (in the gastrocnemius for backward-directed impulses, in the tibialis anterior for forward-directed impulses). For a given acceleration rate, their amplitude was about equal to the sum of the EMG amplitude of the displaced leg and that of the nondisplaced leg obtained during unilateral displacement. The inverse result was obtained when the legs were simultaneously displaced in opposite directions: EMG responses in both legs were significantly smaller than those obtained after unilateral displacement. 4. It is concluded that a unilateral displacement evokes reflex EMG responses in the synergistic muscles of both legs, which are graded according to the size of the proprioceptive input from the primarily displaced joint. During bilateral displacements, the activity induced by the respective contralateral leg is linearly summed or subtracted, depending on whether the legs are displaced in the same or in opposite directions. In view of the short latencies of these bilateral responses, it would seem that they are mediated by a spinal mechanism. 5. Distinct differences in the behavior of the antagonistic leg muscles were observed: 1) the coactivation of the contralateral leg muscle was significantly smaller when the gastrocnemius was stretched unilaterally, whereas it was about equal for the tibialis anterior; and 2) the gastrocnemius EMG responses were closely correlated with the displacement velocity, whereas the tibialis anterior response was more closely correlated with acceleration, i.e., the tibialis anterior response was more dynamic in nature.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Manjarrez, Z. Hernandez-Paxtian, and A. F. Kohn
Spinal Source for the Synchronous Fluctuations of Bilateral Monosynaptic Reflexes in Cats
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3199 - 3210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. H. Ting and J. M. Macpherson
Ratio of Shear to Load Ground-Reaction Force May Underlie the Directional Tuning of the Automatic Postural Response to Rotation and Translation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 808 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
V. Dietz and S. J. Harkema
Locomotor activity in spinal cord-injured persons
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1954 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
V. Dietz, R. Muller, and G. Colombo
Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors
Brain, December 1, 2002; 125(12): 2626 - 2634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. S. Marigold and A. E. Patla
Strategies for Dynamic Stability During Locomotion on a Slippery Surface: Effects of Prior Experience and Knowledge
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 339 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. Duysens, F. Clarac, and H. Cruse
Load-Regulating Mechanisms in Gait and Posture: Comparative Aspects
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 83 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. H. Ting, C. C. Raasch, D. A. Brown, S. A. Kautz, and F. E. Zajac
Sensorimotor State of the Contralateral Leg Affects Ipsilateral Muscle Coordination of Pedaling
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1341 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. E Major and P. B Butler
Discussion of segmental stability with implications for motor learning
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1995; 9(2): 167 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online