Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 62, Issue 3 750-767, Copyright © 1989 by APS

ARTICLES

Kinematic strategies and sensorimotor transformations in the wiping movements of frogs

S. F. Giszter, J. McIntyre and E. Bizzi
Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139.

1. Spinal frogs are known to make coordinated and successful wiping movements to almost all places on the body and legs. Such wiping movements involve a sensorimotor transformation. Information from both the spatial locations of stimuli on the skin and the body configuration of the frog is transformed into a set of motor commands that generate body movements adequate to successfully remove the irritant. The spinal cord itself therefore has a limited capacity for sensorimotor transformations. 2. We examined the kinematics of wiping motions in both spinal and intact leopard frogs and bullfrogs. This data was used to assess the flexibility, precision, and strategy of the kinematic sensorimotor transformations used during wiping. The movements involved the use of redundant degrees of freedom in the limbs. Thus many possible movements or solutions could generate successful wiping. This redundancy allows motor-equivalent movements to be used by the frog. 3. Movements were examined in two dimensions by the use of VHS shuttered-video recording and in three dimensions with the use of a WATSMART system of infrared diodes and cameras. The kinematic analysis was applied to those motions in which the limbs did not interact with kinematic constraints, such as the surface of the substrate or body. These unconstrained motions are directly related to motor commands and thus more easily interpreted. 4. Wiping movements to the back were retained in essentially the same form in both spinal and intact frogs. In both cases wiping had four phases with a fifth occasionally present. The phases included flexion, placing, aiming, and whisking, with occasional extension and multiply repeated wipes. However, the aiming phase was often very brief or absent in this data, and flexion was sometimes omitted in multiple wipes. We found that the placing posture was adjusted in a simple way in response to variations in the location of the target stimulus. The rostrocaudal position of the foot tip was strongly and linearly related to the rostrocaudal stimulus location. 5. During the placing posture, joint angles as well as the limb tip in back wipes had linear relationships to the stimulus' rostrocaudal coordinate. The limb configuration used by the frog allowed a strategy of linear (and potentially independent) postural adjustment of joint angle to stimulus position to generate almost linear endpoint adjustments in the placing phase of wiping. This solution to the ill-posed problem of choosing a joint angle for the placing posture in back-wiping may be computationally simple.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Individual Premotor Drive Pulses, Not Time-Varying Synergies, Are the Units of Adjustment for Limb Trajectories Constructed in Spinal Cord J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2409 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Bryson Mechanisms of Action Selection: Introduction to the Special Issue Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 2007; 15(1): 5 - 8. [PDF]

				M. G. Sirota, G. A. Pavlova, and I. N. Beloozerova Activity of the Motor Cortex During Scratching J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 753 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Richardson, J.-J. E. Slotine, E. Bizzi, and M. C. Tresch Intrinsic Musculoskeletal Properties Stabilize Wiping Movements in the Spinalized Frog J. Neurosci., March 23, 2005; 25(12): 3181 - 3191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Hart and S. F. Giszter Modular Premotor Drives and Unit Bursts as Primitives for Frog Motor Behaviors J. Neurosci., June 2, 2004; 24(22): 5269 - 5282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Durr and T. Matheson Graded Limb Targeting in an Insect Is Caused by the Shift of a Single Movement Pattern J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1754 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kargo, F. Nelson, and L. C. Rome Jumping in frogs: assessing the design of the skeletal system by anatomically realistic modeling and forward dynamic simulation J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2002; 205(12): 1683 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Poppele, G. Bosco, and A. M. Rankin Independent Representations of Limb Axis Length and Orientation in Spinocerebellar Response Components J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 409 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bosco and R. E. Poppele Proprioception From a Spinocerebellar Perspective Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 539 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Scheidt, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, M. A. Conditt, W. Z. Rymer, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Persistence of Motor Adaptation During Constrained, Multi-Joint, Arm Movements J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 853 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Afferent Roles in Hindlimb Wipe-Reflex Trajectories: Free-Limb Kinematics and Motor Patterns J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1480 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Rapid Correction of Aimed Movements by Summation of Force-Field Primitives J. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 409 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bianchi, D. Angelini, G. P. Orani, and F. Lacquaniti Kinematic Coordination in Human Gait: Relation to Mechanical Energy Cost J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 2155 - 2170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Desmurget and C. Prablanc Postural Control of Three-Dimensional Prehension Movements J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 452 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Bizzi, F. Mussa-Ivaldi, and S Giszter Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective Science, July 19, 1991; 253(5017): 287 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]