JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 62: 841-853, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horak, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nashner, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horak, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nashner, L. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 62, Issue 4 841-853, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

Influence of central set on human postural responses

F. B. Horak, H. C. Diener and L. M. Nashner
Neurological Sciences Institute of Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97209.

1. The effect of central set on automatic postural responses was studied in humans exposed to horizontal support-surface perturbations causing forward sway. Central set was varied by providing subjects with prior experience of postural stimulus velocities or amplitudes under 1) serial and random conditions, 2) expected and unexpected conditions, and 3) practiced and unpracticed conditions. In particular, the influence of central-set conditions was examined on the pattern and magnitude of six leg and trunk electromyograph (EMG) activations and associated ankle torque responses to postural perturbations with identical stimulus parameters. 2. The scaling of initial agonist integrated EMG (IEMG) and torque responses to postural perturbation amplitude disappeared when perturbation amplitudes were randomized. This finding suggests that the initial magnitude of postural responses were centrally set to anticipated postural perturbation amplitudes based on sequential experience with the stimulus. 3. Expectation of postural stimulus amplitude had a significant effect on initial torque responses; subjects overresponded when a larger perturbation was expected and underresponded when a smaller perturbation was expected. Expectation of postural stimulus velocity had a smaller effect on initial torque responses, and subjects consistently overresponded when the velocity of the perturbation was unexpected. This difference in amplitude and velocity expectation may be because of the capacity to encode stimulus velocity, but not amplitude information, into the earliest postural responses of the current trial. The relative strength of amplitude and velocity central-set effects varied widely with individual subjects. 4. Central-set conditions did not affect initial EMG response latencies (100 +/- 20 ms, mean +/- SD) or the relative onset of proximal and distal agonists and antagonists. Unexpected or unpracticed stimulus amplitudes, however, were associated with significant late activation of ankle antagonist, tibialis. Thus errors in initial response magnitude because of central-set effects appear to be partially corrected by reciprocal antagonist activity. Agonist IEMG, however, did not always reflect significant changes in torque responses with central-set conditions. 5. Expectation of postural stimulus amplitude and velocity had two different types of effects on the magnitudes of postural responses: 1) a directionally specific, central-set effect consisting of either increased or decreased responses, depending on expectation of stimulus amplitude; and 2) a nonspecific enhanced response to novel stimulus velocities with a gradual reduction when a velocity was presented repeatedly. Two different neural mechanisms are proposed for these two adaptive effects. 6. Reduction of postural response magnitude and antagonist activity during practice may be partially explained by adaptive mechanisms based on expectation because of prior experience with stimulus velocity and amp


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. D. J. Welch and L. H. Ting
A Feedback Model Reproduces Muscle Activity During Human Postural Responses to Support-Surface Translations
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 1032 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
Y.-C. Pai and T. S Bhatt
Repeated-Slip Training: An Emerging Paradigm for Prevention of Slip-Related Falls Among Older Adults
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2007; 87(11): 1478 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Bhatt, E. Wang, and Y.-C. Pai
Retention of Adaptive Control Over Varying Intervals: Prevention of Slip- Induced Backward Balance Loss During Gait
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2913 - 2922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Kiemel, K. S. Oie, and J. J. Jeka
Slow Dynamics of Postural Sway Are in the Feedback Loop
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1410 - 1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Bhatt and Y.-C. Pai
Long-Term Retention of Gait Stability Improvements
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1971 - 1979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
T. W Cacciatore, F. B Horak, and S. M Henry
Improvement in Automatic Postural Coordination Following Alexander Technique Lessons in a Person With Low Back Pain
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2005; 85(6): 565 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Guerraz and B. L. Day
Expectation and the Vestibular Control of Balance
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2005; 17(3): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
M. J. Pavol, E. F. Runtz, and Y.-C. Pai
Young and Older Adults Exhibit Proactive and Reactive Adaptations to Repeated Slip Exposure
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2004; 59(5): M494 - M502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. J. Peterka and P. J. Loughlin
Dynamic Regulation of Sensorimotor Integration in Human Postural Control
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 410 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Dimitrova, F. B. Horak, and J. G. Nutt
Postural Muscle Responses to Multidirectional Translations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 489 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
M. J. Pavol, E. F. Runtz, B. J. Edwards, and Y.-C. Pai
Age Influences the Outcome of a Slipping Perturbation During Initial But Not Repeated Exposures
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2002; 57(8): M496 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Ohki, B. B. Edin, and R. S. Johansson
Predictions Specify Reactive Control of Individual Digits in Manipulation
J. Neurosci., January 15, 2002; 22(2): 600 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Hadders-Algra, E. Brogren, M. Katz-Salamon, and H. Forssberg
Periventricular leucomalacia and preterm birth have different detrimental effects on postural adjustments
Brain, April 1, 1999; 122(4): 727 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P Mummel, D Timmann, U W H Krause, D Boering, A F Thilmann, H C Diener, and F B Horak
Postural responses to changing task conditions in patients with cerebellar lesions
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 1998; 65(5): 734 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. Henry, J. Fung, and F. B. Horak
EMG Responses to Maintain Stance During Multidirectional Surface Translations
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 1939 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online