JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 62: 971-978, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loescher, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loescher, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. P.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 62, Issue 4 971-978, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

Receptor characteristics of periodontal mechanosensitive units supplying the cat's lower canine

A. R. Loescher and P. P. Robinson
Department of Physiology, Birmingham University Medical School, United Kingdom.

1. Forces have been applied to the lower canine teeth of cats, and the range of directions over which single periodontal mechanoreceptors are sensitive (arc of sensitivity) has been determined. We have further studied the response of each unit to forces applied in the direction of maximum sensitivity and investigated whether there is any relationship between the properties of the unit and its location within the periodontal ligament. 2. Recordings were made from 91 single units dissected from the inferior alveolar nerve in six cats. The mean arc of sensitivity to a 0.5 N force applied at right angles to the long axis of the tooth was 312 degrees. The arc of sensitivity was dependent on the force applied and the threshold of the receptor. 3. More units responded maximally to forces applied in a distolingual direction than would have been expected had the responses been evenly distributed around the tooth. Thirty-four of the units were bidirectionally sensitive, 28 became active when the force was removed, and 20 were spontaneously active. 4. The force threshold decreased with increasing rates of force application. 5. The majority of the units (81%) were slowly adapting. The rapidly adapting units had significantly higher force thresholds. 6. Twenty-eight of the receptors could be localized in the periodontal ligament after removing bone overlying the tooth root. There was no apparent relationship between the distance of the receptor from the fulcrum and its arc of sensitivity, threshold, maximum frequency of discharge, or adaptation properties.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. F. Ross, A. Eckhardt, A. Herrel, W. L. Hylander, K. A. Metzger, V. Schaerlaeken, R. L. Washington, and S. H. Williams
Modulation of intra-oral processing in mammals and lepidosaurs
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 118 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
K. S. Turker
REFLEX CONTROL OF HUMAN JAW MUSCLES
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 85 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. S. Turker and M. Jenkins
Reflex Responses Induced by Tooth Unloading
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 1088 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online