JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 62: 1006-1017, 1989;
0022-3077/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapple, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapple, W. D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 62, Issue 5 1006-1017, Copyright © 1989 by APS


ARTICLES

Mechanics of stretch in activated crustacean slow muscle. II. Dynamic changes in force in response to stretch

W. D. Chapple
Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06268.

1. The mechanical dynamics of the ventral superficial muscles (VSM) of the abdomen of the hermit crab, Pagurus pollicarus, have been analyzed to develop a quantitative model of gradedly excitable arthropod muscle. Such a model is important for understanding the role of proprioceptive reflexes in posture and movement. 2. The decay in force produced after ramp stretch of both passive and active muscle was approximated by the use of regression equations involving a direct term and one to three exponential terms. A second-order equation produced an acceptable description of this decay over short (0.5 s) sampling durations. 3. The rate constants of the regression equation did not vary with stretch length, velocity, or activation level of the muscle. For the two-exponential-term model, the rate constants were approximately 90 and 9 s-1 for a sample duration of 0.3 s. An additional rate constant of approximately 1 s-1 was needed to adapt the model to longer sample times. 4. The direct term and the middle-order (9 s-1) residual were both functions of stretch length and activation level. The high-order (90 s-1) residual was primarily a function of stretch length and velocity. Transfer functions omitting the velocity dependence adequately described the mechanical dynamics of the muscle for physiological ranges of stretch velocity. 5. White-noise length perturbations were used to calculate spectral density functions of muscle force and length. These measurements confirmed the principal observations of the ramp stretch analysis: the frequency response of the muscle was independent of the level of activation; the magnitude of the stiffness increased over the stretch frequency range of 4-40 Hz and was then almost constant; and the phase response of the muscle became slightly positive over the same range of stretch frequency. 6. The speed of activation of the muscle to different stimulus frequencies was estimated by fitting a single exponential equation to the rise in isometric tension at the onset of stimulation of the motor nerve. The rate constant increased with stimulus frequency, but its maximum value was only 1.8 s-1, about one-fourth of the middle mechanical rate constant. 7. Because muscle activation is slower than the mechanical dynamics, it is unlikely that the nervous system can regulate muscle dynamics. However, it is possible that mechanical impedance could be regulated to maintain a desired time-averaged value.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. D. Chapple
Regulation of Muscle Stiffness During Periodic Length Changes in the Isolated Abdomen of the Hermit Crab
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1997; 78(3): 1491 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online