JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 63: 841-859, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C. I.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 63, Issue 4 841-859, Copyright © 1990 by APS


ARTICLES

Simulation of motion on the skin. III. Mechanisms used by rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the primate hand for spatiotemporal resolution and two-point discrimination

E. P. Gardner and C. I. Palmer
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016.

1. The contribution of rapidly adapting (RA) mechanoreceptors to two-point discrimination has been evaluated by examining their ability to resolve the spacing of grating patterns shifted across the skin. The experiments test two different neural coding mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie resolution of spatial detail on the hand: 1) a rate-intensity code in which the spacing of surface features is encoded by the average frequency of firing of individual sensory afferents, and 2) an isomorphic representation of shape in which variations in the firing patterns of individual afferents reflect the spatiotemporal profile of skin indentation. 2. To measure the spatial acuity of RA mechanoreceptors innervating the hands of macaque monkeys, we displayed pairs of horizontal bars spaced 1-13 mm apart on a computer-controlled OPTACON stimulator placed over glabrous skin. Two-point resolution was measured by simultaneously pulsing pairs of rows at rates of 100, 50 and 25 Hz; each pair was shifted in tandem across the hand to simulate lateral motion. Single-fiber recordings were made from physiologically identified RA afferents in anesthetized monkeys. 3. Receptive field diameter appears to be the critical determinant of spatial resolution of gaps between two bars. RAs fire continuously if bar spacing is less than the field diameter but do not summate inputs when both active rows are contained within the field. Response profiles evoked by two bars spaced less than 4.8 mm apart can be predicted from the single-bar profiles, assuming occlusion between overlapping inputs with the strongest member dominating axonal output. Two-thirds of the RAs tested discharge 1 spike/pulse as bar patterns cross the field, yielding a uniform spike train whose frequency reflects stimulus pulse rates but fails to indicate gaps between bars. An additional 17% fire 2 spikes/pulse when the bars contact or straddle the field center, but also fail to differentiate individual stripes spaced less than 3.6 mm apart. 4. Only 17% of RAs represent gaps narrower than the field diameter. These fibers show double-peaked response profiles to bar patterns spaced at least 2.4 mm apart, firing 2 spikes/pulse as first one, and then the second stripe crosses the field center. Timing between peaks corresponds to bar spacing. Responses are reduced in amplitude when adjacent bars straddle the field center, as occlusion between simultaneous inputs prevents summation of inputs from the two stimuli. Fifteen of 16 RAs failed to resolve bars spaced 1.2 mm apart, as double-spike responses were evoked only by the leading stripe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Bensmaia, J. C. Craig, T. Yoshioka, and K. O. Johnson
SA1 and RA Afferent Responses to Static and Vibrating Gratings
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1771 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. W. V. Boven, R. H. Hamilton, T. Kauffman, J. P. Keenan, and A. Pascual-Leone
Tactile spatial resolution in blind Braille readers
Neurology, June 27, 2000; 54(12): 2230 - 2236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Vega-Bermudez and K. O. Johnson
Surround Suppression in the Responses of Primate SA1 and RA Mechanoreceptive Afferents Mapped with a Probe Array
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2711 - 2719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. T. Blake, K. O. Johnson, and S. S. Hsiao
Monkey Cutaneous SAI and RA Responses to Raised and Depressed Scanned Patterns: Effects of Width, Height, Orientation, and a Raised Surround
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2503 - 2517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online