JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 63: 1361-1372, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 63, Issue 6 1361-1372, Copyright © 1990 by APS


ARTICLES

Neurotransmitter receptors mediating excitatory input to cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. II. Nonlagged cells

E. Hartveit and P. Heggelund
Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Oslo, Norway.

1. We studied the type of receptor for excitatory amino acids (EAA) that mediates visual responses of nonlagged cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) by recording the visual response of single cells to a stationary flashing spot before, during, and after iontophoretical application of antagonists and agonists to EAA receptors. 2. The visual response of the nonlagged cells was strongly suppressed, in a dose-dependent manner, by the specific quisqualate/kainate receptor antagonist 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX). The average degree of suppression was 74%. Quisqualate enhanced the visual response. 3. Specific antagonists to the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor had a weak suppressing effect on most nonlagged cells. The average degree of suppression was 22%. Measurement of such weak effects was complicated by the considerable spontaneous fluctuations of responsivity in the LGN cells. In the majority of cells where the visual response was suppressed by NMDA antagonists, the tonic response component was more strongly suppressed than the initial transient response component. The visual response was enhanced by NMDA, and this enhancement was antagonized by NMDA antagonists. 4. These findings suggest that the excitatory input from the retina to nonlagged LGN cells is mainly mediated by non-NMDA receptors. The non-NMDA receptors mediate fast EPSPs, and this can explain the fast onset and offset of the visual response of the nonlagged cells. 5. The generally small contribution from NMDA receptors to the visual response of the nonlagged cells might reflect a minor involvement of these receptors in the retinal input, or it could be related to the excitatory input to LGN from the visual cortex. 6. To study whether the expression of NMDA receptors was related to modulatory brain stem input to LGN, we examined the effects of the NMDA antagonists when the visual response was enhanced with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) antagonists or acetylcholine (ACh). Neither of these pharmacologic manipulations consistently increased the relative contribution of NMDA receptors to the visual response. 7. No pharmacologic difference was found between nonlagged X- and Y-cells, or between ON- and OFF-center cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Augustinaite and P. Heggelund
Changes in firing pattern of lateral geniculate neurons caused by membrane potential dependent modulation of retinal input through NMDA receptors
J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 297 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. C. Sincich, D. L. Adams, J. R. Economides, and J. C. Horton
Transmission of Spike Trains at the Retinogeniculate Synapse
J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2683 - 2692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Blitz and W. G. Regehr
Retinogeniculate Synaptic Properties Controlling Spike Number and Timing in Relay Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2438 - 2450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. B. Saul and J. C. Feidler
Development of Response Timing and Direction Selectivity in Cat Visual Thalamus and Cortex
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 2945 - 2955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
U. Hillenbrand and J. L. van Hemmen
Does Corticothalamic Feedback Control Cortical Velocity Tuning?
Neural Comput., February 1, 2001; 13(2): 327 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. L. Bartlett and P. H. Smith
Anatomic, Intrinsic, and Synaptic Properties of Dorsal and Ventral Division Neurons in Rat Medial Geniculate Body
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 1999 - 2016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. L. Humphrey, A. B. Saul, and J. C. Feidler
Strobe Rearing Prevents the Convergence of Inputs With Different Response Timings Onto Area 17 Simple Cells
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 3005 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
C. S. Colwell and M. Menaker
NMDA as Well as Non-NMDA Receptor Antagonists Can Prevent the Phase-Shifting Effects of Light on the Circadian System of the Golden Hamster
J Biol Rhythms, July 1, 1992; 7(2): 125 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online