JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 64: 313-325, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pflug, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ahnelt, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pflug, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ahnelt, P. K.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 64, Issue 2 313-325, Copyright © 1990 by APS


ARTICLES

Background-induced flicker enhancement in cat retinal horizontal cells. I. Temporal and spectral properties

R. Pflug, R. Nelson and P. K. Ahnelt
Institut fur Allgemeine und Vergleichende Physiologie, Universitat Wien, Vienna, Austria.

1. Dim backgrounds can enhance small-spot flicker responses of cat retinal horizontal cells by a factor of 2 or more. 2. Intracellular marking with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) reveals that this enhancement effect occurs in--but is not necessarily limited to--the cone-connected, A-type horizontal cell. 3. Flicker amplitudes decrease over a frequency range from 3 to 36 Hz of square-wave photic stimulation. There is little evidence of flicker-response enhancement at 3 Hz. Flicker-response enhancement is typically 2-6 times larger at 35 than at 6 Hz. 4. Inspection of flicker waveforms indicates both a scaling-up of response signals with backgrounds and a distortion composed of 2- to 5-ms-latency decrease, expressed primarily within a quick component of OFF-repolarization. 5. Flicker enhancement first increases as a function of background irradiance and then decreases. The increasing limb has the dynamic range and spectral sensitivity of cat rods (507-nm peak). Enhancement is maintained during rod after-effects. The decreasing limb of the background-versus-intensity function results from light adaptation of cat, long-wavelength (red) cones. 6. The flicker responses themselves peak spectrally at approximately 555 nm and reflect only the activity of cat long-wavelength (red) cones, without evidence of intermixing of other photoreceptor mechanisms. 7. Thus within the first synaptic layer of the cat visual system, rod signals interact with the flicker responses of red cones, both increasing cone-signal amplitudes and modifying cone-signal waveforms. 8. The results are closely analogous to "suppressive rod-cone interaction" (SRCI) as described in human psychophysics. 9. An outer-plexiform-layer circuit involving rods, horizontal cells and cones may mediate rod-induced enhancement of cone flicker. This being the case, notions of horizontal-cell feedback interactions with cones may have to be modified and extended. A specific feedback model is elaborated in the companion paper.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. K. Mojumder, D. M. Sherry, and L. J. Frishman
Contribution of voltage-gated sodium channels to the b-wave of the mammalian flash electroretinogram
J. Physiol., May 15, 2008; 586(10): 2551 - 2580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
R. L. Chappell and S. Redenti
Endogenous Zinc as a Neuromodulator in Vertebrate Retina: Evidence From the Retinal Slice
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2001; 201(2): 265 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Freed
Rate of Quantal Excitation to a Retinal Ganglion Cell Evoked by Sensory Input
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2956 - 2966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online