JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 64: 1033-1042, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corcos, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corcos, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, G. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 64, Issue 3 1033-1042, Copyright © 1990 by APS


ARTICLES

Organizing principles for single-joint movements. IV. Implications for isometric contractions

D. M. Corcos, G. C. Agarwal, B. P. Flaherty and G. L. Gottlieb
Department of Physical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago 60680.

1. Normal human subjects made isometric pulse and step contractions about the elbow to visually defined target torques of different amplitudes and at different rates. We measured joint torque and electromyograms (EMG) from two agonist and two antagonist muscles. 2. When the task specification requires that the subject explicitly alter the rate at which torque is increased, the rates of rise of the agonist and antagonist EMG bursts covary with the rate of rise of the torque. For pulses of torque the duration of motoneuron excitation varies with the duration of the task-defined contractile event. 3. When a subject is asked to generate torques of different amplitudes without specifying a time interval, torque amplitude is positively correlated with how long, and therefore how high, the EMG rose. Subjects usually proportionately covary the strength of the agonist and antagonist contractions but are not constrained to do so. Some subjects use a strategy of varying the antagonist inversely with the agonist contraction. 4. We extend the organizing principles for the control of movement about a single joint to the control of isometric torque. These rules state that control of torque about a single joint is exercised by one of two strategies: the speed-sensitive strategy modulates the rate at which contraction rises by varying the intensity of motoneuron-pool excitation. The speed-insensitive strategy varies the duration over which contraction rises but does not change the rate. These two respective patterns of torque emerge from pulse-height and pulse-width modulation of motoneuron-pool excitation. 5. The rules defining speed-sensitive and speed-insensitive strategies for movements are broadened for isometric contractions because of the wider range of torque patterns that we observe under these conditions. We propose a step-excitation component for prolonged isometric step contractions and slowly rising ramp patterns of excitation for contractions that develop over several hundreds of milliseconds. 6. The choice of strategies is based on task-specific torque requirements. The same two strategies that control torque to produce movement apply to the control of isometric torque. Unlike movements, however, isometric tasks are more often controlled by a blending of the two patterns. Possible reasons for this are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. A. Christou, B. Poston, J. A. Enoka, and R. M. Enoka
Different Neural Adjustments Improve Endpoint Accuracy With Practice in Young and Old Adults
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3340 - 3350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online