JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 64: 1043-1054, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frumkes, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frumkes, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 64, Issue 3 1043-1054, Copyright © 1990 by APS

ARTICLES

Independent influences of rod adaptation on cone-mediated responses to light onset and offset in distal retinal neurons

T. E. Frumkes and S. M. Wu
Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing 11367.

1. The influence of rod adaptation on cone-mediated intracellular responses of distal retinal neurons was examined in the larval tiger salamander. Rods were selectively stimulated by the use of 450-520 nm adapting stimuli too dim to appreciably influence cones. Cones were primarily stimulated with the use of deep-red stimuli (maximally sensitive to wavelengths greater than 650 nm). The qualitative properties of rod-cone interaction were assessed with the use of several different photic-stimulus paradigms. 2. Confirming results of prior studies, we showed that rod adaptation changed the time course of cone-mediated responses to the onset of square-wave light flashes in horizontal cells (HCs); rod adaptation had no similar influence in other distal retinal neurons. Rod adaptation also enhanced cone-mediated responses to rapid flicker in cones, hyperpolarizing (HPBCs) and depolarizing (DPBCs) bipolar cells, as well as HCs. 3. We also examined the influence of rod-stimulating background fields on cone-mediated responses to slow (approximately 1-Hz) flicker composed of sawteeth with a rapid onset (ramp offset) or with a rapid offset (ramp onset). Such stimulation maintained a constant state of long-term adaptation while providing cones with transient-ON or transient-OFF stimulation. 4. Rod adaptation speeds up the response of HCs to rapid onset and increases response amplitude. Rod adaptation had no reliable influence on response to rapid onset in cones or bipolar cells. 5. Rod adaptation enhanced the amplitude of responses of HCs to rapid offset without altering response time course. 6. Rod adaptation greatly enhanced the amplitude of DPBC responses to rapid offset having no reliable influence on the time course of the response. 7. Rod adaptation caused responses of HPBCs to rapid offset to become much more transient. Rod backgrounds had a similar but smaller and less reliable influence on the response of cones to rapid offset. 8. The foregoing results indicate that rod adaptation exerts a minimum of two separate influences on cone-mediated responses in distal amphibian retina. Changes at light onset must reflect the operation of a mechanism that alters response kinetics of the HC membrane. Changes at light offset reflect the operation of a separate mechanism or set of mechanisms that must act in part presynaptically to the HCs.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online