JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 64: 903-914, 1990;
0022-3077/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Prechtl, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Prechtl, J. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 64, Issue 3 903-914, Copyright © 1990 by APS


ARTICLES

Event-related potentials in the retina and optic tectum of fish

T. H. Bullock, M. H. Hofmann, F. K. Nahm, J. G. New and J. C. Prechtl
Neurobiology Unit, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, California.

1. Compound field potentials were recorded with up to 18 microelectrodes in comb, brush, or spear arrays on and in the optic tectum and with suction electrodes from the distal stump of the cut optic nerve and from the optic nerve head in the opened eye in elasmobranchs and teleosts. Diffuse light flashes of different durations and submaximal intensities were delivered in trains with regular or irregular interstimulus intervals (ISI). 2. Event-related potentials (ERPs) are visible in single trials and begin at 50-200 ms after an "oddball" flash, especially one that is slightly weaker, briefer, or delayed by as little as 6% of ISI, compared with the more frequent stimulus. ERPs to the opposite condition are not of the same form or size. 3. One or more stimuli were omitted from a train or the train terminated after various conditioning times. Deflections occur beyond the expected visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) to the last flash and are called omitted-stimulus potentials (OSPs). They occur on schedule--approximately 100 ms after the next flash would be due--almost independent of intensity, duration, or conditioning time. They are considered to be ERPs without any necessary implication or denial of a temporally specific expectation. 4. Three components of OSP occur alone or in combination: an initial fast peak, a slow wave, and an oscillatory spindle up to ls or more in duration. This resembles the OFF response to steady light. 5. All these components are already present in the retina with optic nerve cut. 6. The same mean ISI with a high proportion of jitter gives OSPs with only slightly longer latencies and smaller amplitudes; the OSP acts as though the retina makes an integrated prediction of ISI, intensity, and duration. 7. During a conditioning train the equilibrium between excitation and inhibition after each flash changes according to frequency, intensity, duration, and conditioning time; the VEP reflects this in a shape unique to the ISI; inhibition increases rapidly after each flash and then decays slowly according to the recent mean ISI. This allows rebound disinhibition after missing, weak, or delayed flashes (OSP or ERP) or causes an altered VEP after a longer or stronger oddball. 8. It seems unlikely that the OSP or oddball ERP in fish tectum is equivalent to mammalian ERPs under the same regime or signals higher cognitive events, because they are already present in the retina, require flash frequencies greater than 1 Hz, and grow with frequency up to and beyond flicker fusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. L. Fairhall, C. A. Burlingame, R. Narasimhan, R. A. Harris, J. L. Puchalla, and M. J. Berry II
Selectivity for Multiple Stimulus Features in Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2724 - 2738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. A. Caputi, P. A. Aguilera, and M. E. Castello
Probability and amplitude of novelty responses as a function of the change in contrast of the reafferent image in G. carapo
J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2003; 206(6): 999 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Ramon, O. H. Hernandez, and T. H. Bullock
Event-related potentials in an invertebrate: crayfish emit omitted stimulus potentials'
J. Exp. Biol., March 14, 2002; 204(24): 4291 - 4300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Galambos, O. Szabo-Salfay, E. Szatmari, N. Szilagyi, and G. Juhasz
Sleep modifies retinal ganglion cell responses in the normal rat
PNAS, February 13, 2001; 98(4): 2083 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. C. Prechtl, G. von der Emde, J. Wolfart, S. Karamursel, G. N. Akoev, Y. N. Andrianov, and T. H. Bullock
Sensory Processing in the Pallium of a Mormyrid Fish
J. Neurosci., September 15, 1998; 18(18): 7381 - 7393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Galambos and G. Juhasz
How patterns of bleached rods and cones become visual perceptual experiences: A proposal
PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 11702 - 11707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online