JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 65: 606-629, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banks, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banks, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, M. B.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 65, Issue 3 606-629, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Regularity analysis in a compartmental model of chopper units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus

M. I. Banks and M. B. Sachs
Neurosciences Training Program, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison 53706.

1. We investigate the discharge patterns of chopper units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) by developing an equivalent cylinder compartmental model of AVCN stellate cells, which are the sources of the chopper response pattern. The model consists of a passive dendritic tree connected to somatic and axonal compartments with voltage-sensitive channels. Synaptic inputs to the model are simulated auditory nerve fiber responses to best-frequency tones. 2. We adjust the anatomic and electrical parameters of the model to agree with available intracellular data from stellate cells in the AVCN of the mouse and the cat and compare the response of the model to injected current with responses recorded in vitro. The model shows approximately linear current-voltage characteristics for small hyperpolarizing currents. The model's input resistance and the time course of its response to hyperpolarizing current applied at the soma are comparable with those measured from stellate cells in vitro. In response to sustained depolarizing current, the model fires repetitively with nearly perfect regularity, a property also observed in vitro. 3. Auditory nerve inputs to the cell are modeled as deadtime-modified Poisson processes with a multiexponential adaptation in the Poisson rate. We are able to adjust the number, rate, and location of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the model and succeed in simulating chopper response patterns seen in vivo. 4. Chopper units exhibit a variety of regularity and adaptation patterns in response to tone stimuli. Physiological data from brain slice experiments and experiments in vivo imply that this heterogeneity is primarily due to differences in input configurations. By systematically varying the number and position of excitatory and inhibitory inputs, we can simulate a range of chopper response patterns. 5. We quantify the regularity of the model's response using the coefficient of variation (CV) of the interspike interval. We find that the CV decreases, i.e., the regularity increases, as the number of converging inputs or their distance from the soma increases. The regularity of the output is more sensitive to the number of converging inputs than to their location on the dendritic tree. The statistics of the first spike latency (FSL) are also sensitive to the configuration of excitatory inputs. The mean and minimum FSL are more sensitive to the electrotonic distance of the inputs from the soma than to the number of inputs, whereas the standard deviation of the FSL is highly dependent on the number of converging inputs and is nearly independent of their location.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Gai and L. H. Carney
Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1077 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. L. Tan and J.G.G. Borst
Comparison of Responses of Neurons in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus to Current Injections, Tones of Different Durations, and Sinusoidal Amplitude-Modulated Tones
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 454 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Gai and L. H. Carney
Temporal Measures and Neural Strategies for Detection of Tones in Noise Based on Responses in Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2451 - 2464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Needham and A. G. Paolini
Fast Inhibition Underlies the Transmission of Auditory Information between Cochlear Nuclei
J. Neurosci., July 16, 2003; 23(15): 6357 - 6361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. S. Rothman and P. B. Manis
The Roles Potassium Currents Play in Regulating the Electrical Activity of Ventral Cochlear Nucleus Neurons
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3097 - 3113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Brown
Response Adaptation of Medial Olivocochlear Neurons Is Minimal
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2381 - 2392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Adam, P. G. Finlayson, and D.W.F. Schwarz
Membrane Properties of Principal Neurons of the Lateral Superior Olive
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 922 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Cai, J. McGee, and E. J. Walsh
Contributions of Ion Conductances to the Onset Responses of Octopus Cells in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus: Simulation Results
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 301 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. G. Paolini and G. M. Clark
Intracellular Responses of Onset Chopper Neurons in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus to Tones: Evidence for Dual-Component Processing
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2347 - 2359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Zacksenhouse, D. H. Johnson, J. Williams, and C. Tsuchitani
Single-Neuron Modeling of LSO Unit Responses
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3098 - 3110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. J. May, G. S. L. Prell, and M. B. Sachs
Vowel Representations in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus of the Cat: Effects of Level, Background Noise, and Behavioral State
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 1755 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. J. Ferragamo, N. L. Golding, and D. Oertel
Synaptic Inputs to Stellate Cells in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 51 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Cai, E. J. Walsh, and J. McGee
Mechanisms of Onset Responses in Octopus Cells of the Cochlear Nucleus: Implications of a Model
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 872 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Rees, A. Sarbaz, M. S. Malmierca, and F. E. N. Le Beau
Regularity of Firing of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 2945 - 2965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online