Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 65, Issue 3 702-714, Copyright © 1991 by APS

ARTICLES

Characterization of the electroantennogram in Drosophila melanogaster and its use for identifying olfactory capture and transduction mutants

E. Alcorta
Max-Planck-Institut fuer biologische Kybernetik, Tuebingen, Federal Republic of Germany.

1. Amplitude as well as time course of the electroantennogram (EAG) in Drosophila has been used for describing electrical changes produced in the antenna in response to odorous stimulation. 2. Maximal amplitude of response appears to be directly correlated to stimulus concentration but, after achieving a maximum value, is independent of stimulation duration. 3. Rise time and fall time constants have been quantified for describing kinetics of response. The rise time constant decreases, but the fall time constant increases when increasing concentrations of odorant are supplied. 4. Variation among individuals for these EAG parameters is small enough to uncover even partial defects affecting the first sensory step. This fact combined with the possibility of obtaining mutants with defects in any intermediate process producing the electrical response makes the EAG of Drosophila a very useful tool for dissecting the components of the capture and transduction processes in the olfactory sense. 5. This kind of quantitative study of the EAG has been used in a new Drosophila mutant, od A, for localizing peripheral expression of the mutation. od A has been isolated as a behavioral mutant with an abnormally enhanced olfactory response to ethyl acetate. 6. The mutant's EAG in response to this odorant displays a normal amplitude but abnormal kinetics. Rise time as well as fall time show slower kinetics than normal, suggesting some defective step in the capture and transduction process.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. French and S. Meisner A New Method for Wide Frequency Range Dynamic Olfactory Stimulation and Characterization Chem Senses, September 1, 2007; 32(7): 681 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-W. Kwon, T. Lu, M. Rutzler, and L. J. Zwiebel Olfactory responses in a gustatory organ of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae PNAS, September 5, 2006; 103(36): 13526 - 13531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Stensmyr, E. Giordano, A. Balloi, A.-M. Angioy, and B. S. Hansson Novel natural ligands for Drosophila olfactory receptor neurones J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2003; 206(4): 715 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Acebes and A. Ferrus Increasing the Number of Synapses Modifies Olfactory Perception in Drosophila J. Neurosci., August 15, 2001; 21(16): 6264 - 6273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-M. Devaud, A. Acebes, and A. Ferrus Odor Exposure Causes Central Adaptation and Morphological Changes in Selected Olfactory Glomeruli in Drosophila J. Neurosci., August 15, 2001; 21(16): 6274 - 6282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-S. Kim, A. Repp, and D. P. Smith LUSH Odorant-Binding Protein Mediates Chemosensory Responses to Alcohols in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 711 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text]