JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 65: 1411-1421, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simone, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pubols, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simone, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pubols, B. H., Jr

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 65, Issue 6 1411-1421, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

The raccoon lateral cervical nucleus: a single-unit analysis

D. A. Simone and B. H. Pubols Jr
Robert S. Dow Neurological Sciences Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97209.

1. Properties of 90 lateral cervical nucleus (LCN) neurons responsive to light tactile stimulation of ipsilateral body surfaces were examined in pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized raccoons. Peripheral receptive fields (RFs) of 60 of these lay totally or partially on glabrous skin of the forepaw. There were 71 neurons antidromically activated from the contralateral thalamic ventro-basal complex (VB) or medial lemniscus. Results were compared with previous findings in the raccoon spinocervical tract (SCT) and the dorsal column-medial lemniscal system (DC-MLS). 2. RFs located on glabrous skin of the digits were significantly smaller than those located on glabrous skin of the palm. All RFs, whether on glabrous skin of the forepaw or elsewhere, tended to be larger than those of either SCT or DC-MLS neurons. LCN units with glabrous forepaw RFs tended to be located ventrally within the nucleus. 3. Of those LCN neurons for which the RFs lay totally or partially on glabrous skin of the forepaw, relative numbers that were rapidly adapting (RA; 77%) versus slowly adapting (SA; 23%) were comparable with those found in the SCT and in VB. Relative numbers of LCN neurons that were classed as light touch (87%) versus multireceptive (13%) were comparable with those found in the SCT. 4. In contrast to both the SCT and VB, but in common with the prethalamic DC-MLS, indentation velocity coding functions of both RA and SA units fell within homogeneous groupings, power function exponents for RA units tending to be steeper than those for SA units (range of b = 0.710 - 0.919 vs. 0.448 - 0.883). 5. It is concluded that the raccoon spinocervicothalamic system (SCTS) as a whole lacks the "modality and place specificity" associated with the DC-MLS. Although the SCTS probably makes significant contributions to properties of VB neurons, these properties primarily reflect those of neurons of the DC-MLS.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online