JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 65: 1598-1605, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbruzzese, M.
Right arrow Articles by Favale, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abbruzzese, M.
Right arrow Articles by Favale, E.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 65, Issue 6 1598-1605, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Changes in central delay of soleus H reflex after facilitatory or inhibitory conditioning in humans

M. Abbruzzese, L. Reni and E. Favale
Department of Neurology, University of Genoa, Italy.

1. Central delay (CD) changes after facilitatory or inhibitory conditioning of the soleus H reflex have been investigated in a group of normal subjects as a function of the conditioning and test stimulus intensities and also as a function of the Hmax/Mmax ratio. Both facilitation and inhibition of the reflex response have been obtained by conditioning stimulation of the ipsilateral tibial nerve at suitable conditioning-test stimulus intervals. CD changes have been extrapolated from the variations of the time interval between afferent and efferent neural volleys underlying the H reflex, directly recorded from the sciatic nerve. 2. The CD was significantly decreased by facilitatory and increased by inhibitory conditioning. Facilitatory CD changes were positively related to test stimulus strength (at a given conditioning stimulus intensity) and negatively related to conditioning stimulus strength (at a given test stimulus intensity). Both trends were reversed after inhibitory conditioning. The effectiveness of facilitatory conditioning was positively related to the individual Hmax/Mmax ratio whereas a negative relationship could be observed after inhibitory conditioning. 3. Also, the "conditioning threshold" (the minimal conditioning stimulus strength affecting the reflex size) and the "maximal conditioning effect" (the conditioning stimulus intensities leading to either the saturation of the facilitatory effect or the suppression of the reflex response) were significantly related to the Hmax/Mmax ratio. 4. We suggest that temporal changes in the H reflex pathway after facilitatory or inhibitory conditioning stimuli depend both on the size of the motoneuronal pool underlying the reflex response, as determined by the test stimulus intensity, and on the individual excitability of the motoneuronal pool, as defined by the Hmax/Mmax ratio.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online