Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 1 131-139, Copyright © 1991 by APS

ARTICLES

Responses of olfactory receptor cells of spiny lobsters to binary mixtures. II. Pattern mixture interactions

C. D. Derby, M. N. Girardot and P. C. Daniel
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30302-4010.

1. The effect of mixture interactions in individual olfactory receptor cells of the spiny lobster on neural coding of odorant quality of binary mixtures and their components is examined in this paper. Extracellular responses of 98 olfactory receptor cells in the antennules of spiny lobsters to seven compounds [adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP), betaine (Bet), L-cysteine (Cys), L-glutamate (Glu), ammonium chloride (NH4), DL-succinate (Suc), taurine (Tau)] and their binary mixtures were recorded, and mixture interactions in individual olfactory receptor cells were identified. 2. Coding of odorant quality was evaluated by examining across neuron patterns (ANPs)--the relative response magnitudes across neuronal populations. ANPs are a feature of the neuronal population response and are a possible concentration-independent code of odorant quality in this system, as indicated by previous studies and present results. 3. For most binary mixtures the diversity of types and degrees of mixture interactions across the individual cells of a population of cells resulted in ANPs for each mixture to be different from the ANPs for the components of the mixture and different from the ANP predicted for the mixture from the responses to the components (Figs. 2-10). These effects are called pattern mixture interactions (PMIs). PMIs occurred for most binary mixtures, even those that did not produce statistically significant intensity mixture interactions (IMIs) for this same population of cells. 4. The results suggest that PMIs can influence coding of stimulus quality, in some cases by causing an improvement of the contrast between the quality of mixtures and some of their components.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Le Berre, N. Beno, A. Ishii, C. Chabanet, P. Etievant, and T. Thomas-Danguin Just Noticeable Differences in Component Concentrations Modify the Odor Quality of a Blending Mixture Chem Senses, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 389 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Mellon Jr Combining Dissimilar Senses: Central Processing of Hydrodynamic and Chemosensory Inputs in Aquatic Crustaceans Biol. Bull., August 1, 2007; 213(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wroblewska, S. Whalley, M. Fischetti, and P. C. Daniel Identification of Chemosensory Sensilla Activating Antennular Grooming Behavior in the Caribbean Spiny Lobster, Panulirus argus Chem Senses, November 1, 2002; 27(9): 769 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Belluscio and L. C. Katz Symmetry, Stereotypy, and Topography of Odorant Representations in Mouse Olfactory Bulbs J. Neurosci., March 15, 2001; 21(6): 2113 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Duchamp-Viret, A. Duchamp, and M. A. Chaput Peripheral Odor Coding in the Rat and Frog: Quality and Intensity Specification J. Neurosci., March 15, 2000; 20(6): 2383 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Wilson Odor Specificity of Habituation in the Rat Anterior Piriform Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 139 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Getz A Kinetic Model of the Transient Phase in the Response of Olfactory Receptor Neurons Chem Senses, October 1, 1999; 24(5): 497 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kang and J. Caprio In Vivo Responses of Single Olfactory Receptor Neurons of Channel Catfish to Binary Mixtures of Amino Acids J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]