JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 153-169, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 1 153-169, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Neuronal activity in the primary somatosensory cortex in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during active touch of textured surface gratings: responses to groove width, applied force, and velocity of motion

R. J. Sinclair and H. Burton
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

1. In a descriptive survey of primary somatosensory cortex (SI) responses during active touch, two monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained to stroke their fingertips over pairs of gratings with constant ridge (250 microns) and varying groove (500-2,900 microns) width (roughness) and to identify the smoother (smaller groove). Speed of hand motion and applied force level during the stroke were monitored and recorded. Transdural single-unit recordings were obtained from areas 3b and 1 of SI while animals performed the task. 2. The statistical sample consisted of 164 single units. Most cells in the sample responded in some fashion during the stroke, including brief increased or decreased activity to 1-mm ridges (touch strips) placed between surface pairs and at ends of each block to serve as touch sensors. These peristroke response patterns were described briefly. Most cells (153/164) responded to grating contact. Three types of responses to groove width were characterized. 1) Response was proportional to groove width in many cells. There was a vigorous response to roughest and none to smoothest surface. Mean firing rates for these cells appeared linearly related to groove width. 2) Graded responses were seen with smaller response differences to the same groove width range as in 1. Responses of some cells of types 1 and 2 were uncorrelated with variations in applied force and velocity of stroke. 3) There were inverse responses to groove width. Greater responses occurred during contact with smoother surfaces. 3. Many cells were influenced by a combination of changes in groove width, force, and/or velocity. Activity of a small sample of cells in area 1 with slowly adapting (SA) response properties was an almost exclusive positive function of variations in force level. Unlike SAs in 3b, responses of these cells were uncorrelated with alterations in groove width or stroke velocity. Velocity effects were almost always associated with response to groove width. Positive velocity cells coded temporal period. Significant velocity effects were not evident in graded or inverse graded cells. Negative force and velocity effects were due to shifts in behavioral strategy. Periodicity related to the spatial period of the grating was found in autocorrelograms of a small number of cells. Finally, responses of some cells were unaffected by changes in groove width, force, or velocity. Some of these were affected by contact with touch strips. Others responded in undifferentiated fashion to the stroke, and their function remains unresolved. Overall, there was a continuum of response patterns. Subgroups of cells were not distinct.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Depeault, E.-M. Meftah, and C. E. Chapman
Tactile Speed Scaling: Contributions of Time and Space
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1422 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Padberg, E. Disbrow, and L. Krubitzer
The Organization and Connections of Anterior and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Titi Monkeys: Do New World Monkeys Have an Area 2?
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1938 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E.-M. Meftah, J. Shenasa, and C. E. Chapman
Effects of a Cross-Modal Manipulation of Attention on Somatosensory Cortical Neuronal Responses to Tactile Stimuli in the Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3133 - 3149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. R. Pruett Jr., R. J. Sinclair, and H. Burton
Neural Correlates for Roughness Choice in Monkey Second Somatosensory Cortex (SII)
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 2069 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Gamzu and E. Ahissar
Importance of Temporal Cues for Tactile Spatial- Frequency Discrimination
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7416 - 7427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. J. Cascio and K. Sathian
Temporal Cues Contribute to Tactile Perception of Roughness
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 5289 - 5296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. A. Harris, I. M. Harris, and M. E. Diamond
The Topography of Tactile Learning in Humans
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2001; 21(3): 1056 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Salinas, A. Hernandez, A. Zainos, and R. Romo
Periodicity and Firing Rate As Candidate Neural Codes for the Frequency of Vibrotactile Stimuli
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2000; 20(14): 5503 - 5515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. II. Responses to Object Texture and Weights
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 835 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. III. Responses to Altered Friction Perturbations
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 845 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. E. Roland, B. O'Sullivan, and R. Kawashima
Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain
PNAS, March 17, 1998; 95(6): 3295 - 3300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Jiang, F. Tremblay, and C. E. Chapman
Neuronal Encoding of Texture Changes in the Primary and the Secondary Somatosensory Cortical Areas of Monkeys During Passive Texture Discrimination
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1656 - 1662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online