JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 485-496, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, S. E.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 2 485-496, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Visual responses of pulvinar and collicular neurons during eye movements of awake, trained macaques

D. L. Robinson, J. W. McClurkin, C. Kertzman and S. E. Petersen
Section on Visual Behavior, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

1. We recorded from single neurons in awake, trained rhesus monkeys in a lighted environment and compared responses to stimulus movement during periods of fixation with those to motion caused by saccadic or pursuit eye movements. Neurons in the inferior pulvinar (PI), lateral pulvinar (PL), and superior colliculus were tested. 2. Cells in PI and PL respond to stimulus movement over a wide range of speeds. Some of these cells do not respond to comparable stimulus motion, or discharge only weakly, when it is generated by saccadic or pursuit eye movements. Other neurons respond equivalently to both types of motion. Cells in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus have similar properties to those in PI and PL. 3. When tested in the dark to reduce visual stimulation from the background, cells in PI and PL still do not respond to motion generated by eye movements. Some of these cells have a suppression of activity after saccadic eye movements made in total darkness. These data suggest that an extraretinal signal suppresses responses to visual stimuli during eye movements. 4. The suppression of responses to stimuli during eye movements is not an absolute effect. Images brighter than 2.0 log units above background illumination evoke responses from cells in PI and PL. The suppression appears stronger in the superior colliculus than in PI and PL. 5. These experiments demonstrate that many cells in PI and PL have a suppression of their responses to stimuli that cross their receptive fields during eye movements. These cells are probably suppressed by an extraretinal signal. Comparable effects are present in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus. These properties in PI and PL may reflect the function of the ascending tectopulvinar system.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Zhu and F.-S. Lo
Control of Recurrent Inhibition of the Lateral Posterior-Pulvinar Complex by Afferents from the Deep Layers of the Superior Colliculus of the Rabbit
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1122 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Zhu and F.-S. Lo
Recurrent Inhibitory Interneurons of the Rabbit's Lateral Posterior-Pulvinar Complex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3117 - 3124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online