JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 580-589, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herness, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herness, M. S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 2 580-589, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Specificity of mono- and divalent salt transduction mechanisms in frog gustation evidenced by cobalt chloride treatment

M. S. Herness
Laboratory of Neurobiology and Behavior, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021.

1. Discrimination among stimuli with similar physical properties represents a formidable problem in sensory neurophysiology. The differential effect of cobalt chloride treatment on gustatory responses to monovalent and divalent salts may help to explain aspects of how the frog gustatory system encodes these stimuli. 2. Gustatory neural responses recorded from the glossopharyngeal nerve to divalent stimuli (CaCl2 and MgCl2) were inhibited by CoCl2 treatment, whereas monovalent responses (NaCl and KCl) were greatly augmented. Both effects were highly significant and completely reversible. 3. Intracellular recordings from the gustatory receptor cells, which synaptically initiate the impulses in the glossopharyngeal afferents, imply that these neural events are not a simple reflection of the receptor potential magnitude. Monovalent receptor potentials magnitudes (millivolts of depolarization) were enhanced by cobalt chloride, but receptor potentials to divalent stimuli were not inhibited. Rather they were either unaffected (MgCl2) or augmented (CaCl2). 4. Membrane resistance change during salt stimulation with cobalt chloride treatment followed the qualitative pattern observed with the neural response. Membrane resistance (in megohms) of the receptor cell was greater for divalent stimuli with cobalt treatment compared with divalent stimuli alone. Membrane resistance changes for monovalent stimuli were less with cobalt treatment compared with monovalent stimuli alone. These observations indicate that the glossopharyngeal neural response is not a simple reflection of the magnitude of the receptor potential but must be considered in conjunction with membrane resistance as an indicator of synaptic transmission. 5. These data were interpreted in terms of leading models of salt taste transduction, i.e., adsorption theories, phase boundary theories, and the direct penetration theories. Relevant mechanistic considerations for salt taste transduction in the frog include binding by divalents to membrane surface changes and amiloride-sensitive monovalent cation channels. It was concluded that the surface potential alone was not a critical variable in the mechanism of cobalt chloride alteration of salt responses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
K. Okuda-Akabane, H. Fukami, and Y. Kitada
Mechanism of Enhancement of the Responses of the Frog Glossopharyngeal Nerve to Electrolytes by Enhancers
Chem Senses, July 1, 2008; 33(6): 523 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online