JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 794-808, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McClurkin, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Richmond, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McClurkin, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Richmond, B. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 3 794-808, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Lateral geniculate neurons in behaving primates. II. Encoding of visual information in the temporal shape of the response

J. W. McClurkin, T. J. Gawne, L. M. Optican and B. J. Richmond
Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

1. We used the Karhunen-Loeve (K-L) transform to quantify the temporal distribution of spikes in the responses of lateral geniculate (LGN) neurons. The basis functions of the K-L transform are a set of waveforms called principal components, which are extracted from the data set. The coefficients of the principal components are uncorrelated with each other and can be used to quantify individual responses. The shapes of each of the first three principal components were very similar across neurons. 2. The coefficient of the first principal component was highly correlated with the spike count, but the other coefficients were not. Thus the coefficient of the first principal component reflects the strength of the response, whereas the coefficients of the other principal components reflect aspects of the temporal distribution of spikes in the response that are uncorrelated with the strength of the response. Statistical analysis revealed that the coefficients of up to 10 principal components were driven by the stimuli. Therefore stimuli govern the temporal distribution as well as the number of spikes in the response. 3. Through the application of information theory, we were able to compare the amount of stimulus-related information carried by LGN neurons when two codes were assumed: first, a univariate code based on response strength alone; and second, a multivariate temporal code based on the coefficients of the first three principal components. We found that LGN neurons were able to transmit an average of 1.5 times as much information using the three-component temporal code as they could using the strength code. 4. The stimulus set we used allowed us to calculate the amount of information each neuron could transmit about stimulus luminance, pattern, and contrast. All neurons transmitted the greatest amount of information about stimulus luminance, but they also transmitted significant amounts of information about stimulus pattern. This pattern information was not a reflection of the luminance or contrast of the pixel centered on the receptive field. 5. In addition to measuring the average amount of information each neuron transmitted about all stimuli, we also measured the amount of information each neuron transmitted about the individual stimuli with both the univariate spike count code and the multivariate temporal code. We then compared the amount of information transmitted per stimulus with the magnitudes of the responses to the individual stimuli. We found that the magnitudes of both the univariate and the multivariate responses to individual stimuli were poorly correlated with the information transmitted about the individual stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. L. Passaglia and J. B. Troy
Impact of Noise on Retinal Coding of Visual Signals
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 1023 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Aronov, D. S. Reich, F. Mechler, and J. D. Victor
Neural Coding of Spatial Phase in V1 of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3304 - 3327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
H. Nakahara and S.-i. Amari
Information-Geometric Measure for Neural Spikes
Neural Comput., October 1, 2002; 14(10): 2269 - 2316.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Reinagel and R. C. Reid
Temporal Coding of Visual Information in the Thalamus
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2000; 20(14): 5392 - 5400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. A. Ghazanfar, C. R. Stambaugh, and M. A. L. Nicolelis
Encoding of Tactile Stimulus Location by Somatosensory Thalamocortical Ensembles
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2000; 20(10): 3761 - 3775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Wiener and B. J. Richmond
Using Response Models to Estimate Channel Capacity for Neuronal Classification of Stationary Visual Stimuli Using Temporal Coding
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 2861 - 2875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. W. Oram, M. C. Wiener, R. Lestienne, and B. J. Richmond
Stochastic Nature of Precisely Timed Spike Patterns in Visual System Neuronal Responses
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 3021 - 3033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. D. Victor and K. P. Purpura
Spatial Phase and the Temporal Structure of the Response to Gratings in V1
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 554 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online