JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 66: 2022-2033, 1991;
0022-3077/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Keefe, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Berkley, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Keefe, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Berkley, M. A.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 66, Issue 6 2022-2033, Copyright © 1991 by APS


ARTICLES

Binocular immobilization induced by paralysis of the extraocular muscles of one eye: evidence for an interocular proprioceptive mechanism

L. P. O'Keefe and M. A. Berkley
Psychobiology/Neuroscience Program, Florida State University, Tallahassee 32306.

1. Spontaneous changes in the positions of both eyes were measured in anesthetized cats before and after infusion of paralytic or anesthetic agents directly into the extraocular muscle capsule behind one eye. 2. Before retrobulbar injection, large changes in eye position were observed in both eyes. The position changes of each eye were independent of each other and often in opposite directions. 3. Application of a paralytic agent into the orbit of one eye reduced the spontaneous position changes in that eye to a very low level. Unexpectedly, the changes in the position of the other, untreated eye were also greatly reduced. 4. Control experiments demonstrated that the binocular immobilization observed after monocular paralysis was not due to 1) leakage of the paralytic agent from the orbit of the treated eye to the orbit of the untreated eye or 2) systemic vascular transport of the paralytic agent. 5. Passive movement of the paralyzed eye did not induce movement of the untreated eye. 6. Application of a local anesthetic agent rather than a paralytic agent to one eye resulted in reversible reduction of movement only in the treated eye, but not in the untreated eye. 7. The results suggest that the reduction of movement in one eye produced by application of a paralytic agent to the other eye is mediated by an afferent neural signal derived from extraocular muscle proprioceptors possibly gated by a central motor control signal.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C. R WEIR, P. C KNOX, and G. N DUTTON
Does extraocular muscle proprioception influence oculomotor control?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2000; 84(9): 1071 - 1074.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. F. Lewis, D. S. Zee, H. P. Goldstein, and B. L. Guthrie
Proprioceptive and Retinal Afference Modify Postsaccadic Ocular Drift
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 551 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online