JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 67: 775-785, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sessle, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sessle, B. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 67, Issue 3 775-785, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Functional properties of single neurons in the face primary motor cortex of the primate. III. Relations with different directions of trained tongue protrusion

G. M. Murray and B. J. Sessle
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

1. In previous papers we presented evidence pointing to an important role for face motor cortex in the control of tongue movements. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) at many sites within face motor cortex evoked different types of tongue movement, and many neurons at these "tongue-MI" sites received intraoral mechanosensitive afferent input, and their activity was related to a tongue-protrusion task performed by a monkey. In view of the synergistic action of the various tongue muscles during tongue movement, we hypothesized that these different tongue-MI sites are recruited to effect the appropriate change in tongue shape and position during a tongue-protrusion movement. A prediction from this hypothesis is that variations in the direction of a tongue-protrusion movement should be associated with variations in the activities within the different tongue-MI efferent zones. Differences in efferent-zone activity should be reflected in differences in the firing rates of neurons that are located at these tongue-MI sites. 2. We trained two monkeys to perform a tongue-protrusion task at each of three directions. The tongue-protrusion task transducer was positioned at 0 degrees (Ts), 30 degrees to the left (Tlt), or 30 degrees to the right (Trt) from the midsagittal plane; the latter two positions were termed asymmetric tongue-protrusion task positions. Single neurons were recorded from tongue-MI during trials of tongue-protrusion task at each of two or three of the above positions. Some of the neurons were also studied during a biting task. In addition, neurons were tested for possible mechanosensitive afferent input. 3. Of the 66 neurons studied, 31 (45%) exhibited directional relations; that is, the change in firing rate between the pretrial period (PTP) and the task period for the tongue-protrusion task was significantly different for each neuron depending on the direction in which the activity of the neuron was studied. 4. The "directional" neurons exhibited a single preferred direction of firing in that the mean firing rate during one direction of tongue-protrusion task was significantly greater than for any other direction. Of the 20 neurons studied at all three directions of tongue-protrusion task, the mean firing rate of each of 18 was highest at one of the asymmetric positions, and 12 of these 18 neurons exhibited a monotonic decrease in absolute firing frequency from one asymmetric task direction to the other. 5. Thirteen of the neurons were also studied while the monkey performed the biting task. Most tongue-MI directional neurons were not related to the biting task.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
T. Saarinen, H. Laaksonen, T. Parviainen, and R. Salmelin
Motor Cortex Dynamics in Visuomotor Production of Speech and Non-speech Mouth Movements
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2006; 16(2): 212 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
H. Shinagawa, T. Ono, Y. Ishiwata, E. Honda, T. Sasaki, M. Taira, A. Iriki, and T. Kuroda
Hemispheric Dominance of Tongue Control Depends on the Chewing-side Preference
J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2003; 82(4): 278 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Yao, K. Yamamura, N. Narita, R. E. Martin, G. M. Murray, and B. J. Sessle
Neuronal Activity Patterns in Primate Primary Motor Cortex Related to Trained or Semiautomatic Jaw and Tongue Movements
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2531 - 2541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. Jean
Brain Stem Control of Swallowing: Neuronal Network and Cellular Mechanisms
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 929 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. E. Martin, G. M. Murray, P. Kemppainen, Y. Masuda, and B. J. Sessle
Functional Properties of Neurons in the Primate Tongue Primary Motor Cortex During Swallowing
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1997; 78(3): 1516 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Georgopoulos, M Taira, and A Lukashin
Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex
Science, April 2, 1993; 260(5104): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online