Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 67, Issue 4 852-860, Copyright © 1992 by APS

ARTICLES

Evidence that C1 and C2 propriospinal neurons mediate the inhibitory effects of viscerosomatic spinal afferent input on primate spinothalamic tract neurons

S. F. Hobbs, U. T. Oh, M. J. Chandler, Q. G. Fu, D. C. Bolser and R. D. Foreman
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190.

1. Lumbosacral spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons can be inhibited by noxious pinch of the contralateral hindlimb or either forelimb and by electrical stimulation of cardiopulmonary sympathetic, splanchnic, and hypogastric afferents. A previous study found that spinal transections between C2 and C4 sometimes abolished the inhibitory effect of spinal afferent input and sometimes left it intact. This suggested that propriospinal neurons in the C1 and C2 segments might mediate this effect. To test whether neurons in the C1 and C2 segments were involved in producing this inhibitory effect, the magnitude of the reduction in neural activity was measured in the same STT neuron before and after spinal transection at C1 or between C3 and C7. 2. All neurons were antidromically activated from the contralateral thalamus and thoracic spinal cord. For us to accept a neuron for analysis, the characteristics of the somatic input and the latency and shape of the antidromatic spike produced by spinal cord stimulation had to be the same before and after the spinal transection. Also, spinal transection often causes a marked increase in spontaneous cell activity, which may affect the magnitude of an inhibitory response. To avoid this confounding problem, a cell was accepted for analysis only if it showed marked inhibition of high cell activity evoked by somatic pinch before spinal transection. For analysis 13 STT neurons met these criteria: 6 neurons were in monkeys with C1 transections, and 7 neurons were in animals with transections between C3 and C7.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Qin, R. D. Foreman, and J. P. Farber Inhalation of a pulmonary irritant modulates activity of lumbosacral spinal neurons receiving colonic input in rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): R2052 - R2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Chandler, J. Zhang, C. Qin, and R. D. Foreman Spinal Inhibitory Effects of Cardiopulmonary Afferent Inputs in Monkeys: Neuronal Processing in High Cervical Segments J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 1290 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. LeDoux and L. B. Wilson Neuronal application of capsaicin modulates somatic pressor reflexes Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): R868 - R877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Degtyarenko and M. P. Kaufman Fictive locomotion and scratching inhibit dorsal horn neurons receiving thin fiber afferent input Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): R394 - R403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Qin, M. J. Chandler, K. E. Miller, and R. D. Foreman Chemical Activation of Cervical Cell Bodies: Effects on Responses to Colorectal Distension in Lumbosacral Spinal Cord of Rats J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3423 - 3433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Gall, D. Bouhassira, D. Chitour, and D. Le Bars Involvement of the Caudal Medulla in Negative Feedback Mechanisms Triggered by Spatial Summation of Nociceptive Inputs J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 304 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gozariu, D. Bragard, J.-C. Willer, and D. Le Bars Temporal Summation of C-Fiber Afferent Inputs: Competition Between Facilitatory and Inhibitory Effects on C-Fiber Reflex in the Rat J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3165 - 3179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]