JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 67: 1264-1274, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, M.
Right arrow Articles by Soechting, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, M.
Right arrow Articles by Soechting, J. F.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 67, Issue 5 1264-1274, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Kinematics of typing: parallel control of the two hands

M. Flanders and J. F. Soechting
Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

1. Experienced touch typists were asked to type words in which only a single letter was typed by one hand, while the remaining letters were typed with the other hand. 2. Translational and rotational motion of each finger was computed optoelectronically from the location of reflective markers. Translational and rotational motion of both wrists was also computed from the locations of these markers. 3. Typically, when a subject typed a single letter, all of the fingers of the hand were in motion, as was the wrist. For each letter, this overall kinematic pattern of finger and wrist motion was highly repeatable. Thus the keystroke kinematics formed a repeatable signature for a particular letter typed by a particular subject. 4. During the keystroke the other hand was also in motion, typing the preceding and succeeding letters. During this period the motion of the two wrists and the motions of corresponding fingers of both hands was uncorrelated. 5. Because the keystroke kinematics are highly repeatable and independent of the movement of the contralateral hand, each keystroke represents a fundamental element of the typing movement. Thus these results provide a basis for determining the processes whereby sequences of keystrokes are assembled to type words.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. H. Schieber and M. Santello
Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2004; 96(6): 2293 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. R. Mason, J. E. Gomez, and T. J. Ebner
Hand Synergies During Reach-to-Grasp
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2896 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. C. Engel and J. F. Soechting
Manual Tracking in Two Dimensions
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 3483 - 3496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Rijntjes, C. Dettmers, C. Buchel, S. Kiebel, R. S. J. Frackowiak, and C. Weiller
A Blueprint for Movement: Functional and Anatomical Representations in the Human Motor System
J. Neurosci., September 15, 1999; 19(18): 8043 - 8048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Schieber and L. Hibbard
How somatotopic is the motor cortex hand area?
Science, July 23, 1993; 261(5120): 489 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online