JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 67: 1275-1290, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soechting, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soechting, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 67, Issue 5 1275-1290, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Organization of sequential typing movements

J. F. Soechting and M. Flanders
Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

1. Experienced touch typists were asked to type words that contained only one or two letters typed by one of the two hands. When a word contained a pair of letters typed by one hand, the letters could be consecutive, or there could be one, two, or three intervening letters typed with the other hand. 2. We studied cases in which pairs of letters were either identical, different but typed with the same finger, or typed with two different fingers on the same hand. 3. Translational and rotational motion of the fingers and wrist was computed optoelectronically from the location of reflective markers on the hands. Finger and wrist motion recorded when subjects typed pairs of letters was compared with the motion recorded when the subject typed either letter in isolation. 4. When the subject typed the same letter consecutively, or separated by intervening letters, the second keystroke began only after the first key had been pressed. The same result was obtained when the second letter was not identical but was typed with the same finger. Up to the time of the first keypress, the initial keystroke kinematics were identical to those for that letter typed in isolation. 5. When the second letter in a pair was typed with the use of a different finger, the initial focal movement (wrist and finger striking the key) was unaffected up to the time of initial keypress. However, the second finger could begin to move toward the second key shortly before the initial keypress, and therefore the corollary movements normally involved in the initial keystroke were affected. 6. These results indicate that typing movements are executed primarily in a serial fashion, letter by letter. There can be some overlap between consecutive keystrokes only if they are executed with different fingers. 7. Words in which two letters typed with one hand were separated by three letters typed with the other hand provided subjects the opportunity to initiate the second keystroke at a range of times after the first keypress. 8. When the second letter differed from the first, subjects always returned to the home position after the first keypress and initiated the second keystroke with a normal latency. However, when the second letter was the same as the first letter, subjects sometimes suppressed the return to the home position after the first keystroke and maintained their finger poised over the key. 9. Thus keystrokes of one hand are best described as being executed sequentially. However, the findings presented here also indicate that movement planning encompasses strings of letters.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Voller, A. St Clair Gibson, M. Lomarev, S. Kanchana, J. Dambrosia, N. Dang, and M. Hallett
Long-Latency Afferent Inhibition During Selective Finger Movement
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1115 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. D. K. Breteler, J. M. Hondzinski, and M. Flanders
Drawing Sequences of Segments in 3D: Kinetic Influences on Arm Configuration
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3253 - 3263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. E. Jerde, J. F. Soechting, and M. Flanders
Coarticulation in Fluent Fingerspelling
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 2383 - 2393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Hager-Ross and M. H. Schieber
Quantifying the Independence of Human Finger Movements: Comparisons of Digits, Hands, and Movement Frequencies
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2000; 20(22): 8542 - 8550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. H. Schieber, M. Chua, J. Petit, and C. C. Hunt
Tension Distribution of Single Motor Units in Multitendoned Muscles: Comparison of a Homologous Digit Muscle in Cats and Monkeys
J. Neurosci., March 1, 1997; 17(5): 1734 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online