|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 67, Issue 5 1375-1384, Copyright © 1992 by APS
ARTICLES |
A. M. Aniss, S. C. Gandevia and D. Burke
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
1. Reflex responses were elicited in muscles that act at the ankle by electrical stimulation of low-threshold afferents from the foot in human subjects who were reclining supine. During steady voluntary contractions, stimulus trains (5 pulses at 300 Hz) were delivered at two intensities to the sural nerve (1.2-4.0 times sensory threshold) or to the posterior tibial nerve (1.1-3.0 times motor threshold for the intrinsic muscles of the foot). Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were made from tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), soleus (SOL), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles by the use of intramuscular wire electrodes. 2. As assessed by averages of rectified EMG, stimulation of the sural or posterior tibial nerves at nonpainful levels evoked a complex oscillation with onset latencies as early as 40 ms and lasting up to 200 ms in each muscle. The most common initial responses in TA were a decrease in EMG activity at an onset latency of 54 ms for sural stimuli, and an increase at an onset latency of 49 ms for posterior tibial stimuli. The response of PL to stimulation of the two nerves began with a strong facilitation of 44 ms (sural) and 49 ms (posterior tibial). With SOL, stimulation of both nerves produced early inhibition beginning at 45 and 50 ms, respectively. With both LG and MG, sural stimuli produced an early facilitation at 52-53 ms. However, posterior tibial stimuli produced different initial responses in these two muscles: facilitation in LG at 50 ms and inhibition in MG at 51 ms. 3. Perstimulus time histograms of the discharge of 61 single motor units revealed generally similar reflex responses as in multiunit EMG. However, different reflex components were not equally apparent in the responses of different single motor units: an individual motor unit could respond slightly differently with a change in stimulus intensity or background contraction level. The multiunit EMG record represents a global average that does not necessarily depict the precise pattern of all motor units contributing to the average. 4. When subjects stood erect without support and with eyes closed, reflex patterns were seen only in active muscles, and the patterns were similar to those in the reclining posture. 5. It is concluded that afferents from mechanoreceptors in the sole of the foot have multisynaptic reflex connections with the motoneuron pools innervating the muscles that act at the ankle. When the muscles are active in standing or walking, cutaneous feedback may play a role in modulating motoneuron output and thereby contribute to stabilization of stance and gait.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. V. Lamont and E. P. Zehr Earth-Referenced Handrail Contact Facilitates Interlimb Cutaneous Reflexes During Locomotion J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 433 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dominici, Y. P. Ivanenko, and F. Lacquaniti Control of Foot Trajectory in Walking Toddlers: Adaptation to Load Changes J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2790 - 2801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. M. Baken, P. H. J. A. Nieuwenhuijzen, C. M. Bastiaanse, V. Dietz, and J. Duysens Cutaneous reflexes evoked during human walking are reduced when self-induced J. Physiol., January 1, 2006; 570(1): 113 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. De-Doncker, M. Kasri, F. Picquet, and M. Falempin Physiologically adaptive changes of the L5 afferent neurogram and of the rat soleus EMG activity during 14 days of hindlimb unloading and recovery J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2005; 208(24): 4585 - 4592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Fallon, L. R. Bent, P. A. McNulty, and V. G. Macefield Evidence for Strong Synaptic Coupling Between Single Tactile Afferents From the Sole of the Foot and Motoneurons Supplying Leg Muscles J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3795 - 3804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Nielsen How we Walk: Central Control of Muscle Activity during Human Walking Neuroscientist, June 1, 2003; 9(3): 195 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. De-Doncker, F. Picquet, and M. Falempin Effects of cutaneous receptor stimulation on muscular atrophy developed in hindlimb unloading condition J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2000; 89(6): 2344 - 2351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L Behrman and S. J Harkema Locomotor Training After Human Spinal Cord Injury: A Series of Case Studies Physical Therapy, July 1, 2000; 80(7): 688 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.M.H. van Wezel, B.G.M. van Engelen, F.J.M. Gabreels, A.A.W.M. Gabreels-Festen, and J. Duysens Abeta Fibers Mediate Cutaneous Reflexes During Human Walking J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2980 - 2986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. H. Van Wezel, F. A. M. Ottenhoff, and J. Duysens Dynamic Control of Location-Specific Information in Tactile Cutaneous Reflexes from the Foot during Human Walking J. Neurosci., May 15, 1997; 17(10): 3804 - 3814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Harkema, S. L. Hurley, U. K. Patel, P. S. Requejo, B. H. Dobkin, and V. R. Edgerton Human Lumbosacral Spinal Cord Interprets Loading During Stepping J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1997; 77(2): 797 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |