JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 67: 1509-1527, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Willis, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owens, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Willis, W. D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 67, Issue 6 1509-1527, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Changes in the response states of primate spinothalamic tract cells caused by mechanical damage of the skin or activation of descending controls

C. M. Owens, D. Zhang and W. D. Willis
Marine Biomedical Institute, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0843.

1. The responses of a population of 318 spinothalamic tract (STT) cells to mechanical stimulation of the skin were recorded in anesthetized macaque monkeys by several teams of investigators. The responses were subjected to k-means cluster analysis, a multivariate statistical procedure. 2. For an analysis that pertained to the responsiveness of the neurons, the mean responses to four standard mechanical stimuli (Brush, Pressure, Pinch, and Squeeze) were used. Although no true clusters were found, the cells could be partitioned into four groups (called clusters a, b, c, and d) that responded progressively more vigorously to the stimuli. 3. For an analysis that pertained to the selectivity of the cells for various stimulus intensities, from innocuous to highly noxious, the data were normalized by taking the ratio of the mean response evoked by each stimulus to the sum of the responses and multiplying by 100. This procedure does not have a bias toward selection of any particular number of clusters and resulted in three clusters of STT cells. 4. Cluster 1 STT cells responded best to Brush. Cluster 2 cells responded weakly to Brush and Pressure and maximally to Pinch. Cluster 3 cells responded weakly to Brush, Pressure, and Pinch and maximally to Squeeze. 5. The response states of STT cells with respect to mechanical stimulation of the skin can be defined by their cluster assignments on the basis of the responsiveness (clusters a-d) and selectivity (clusters 1-3) of the cells. The response states of newly recorded STT cells can be determined by discriminant analysis from the nearest centroids of the two types of clusters in the reference population of STT cells. 6. No consistent changes in response state were detected when a second series of mechanical stimuli was applied 1 cm from the site stimulated initially or when the stimulus series was alternately repeated at the initial site and at progressively more proximal sites. However, when the stimulus series was applied five times to the initial site, the response state of five of eight cells tested showed a change. Although a change in response state required repetitive damage, even a single stimulus series increased background activity and responses to Brush at undamaged sites. 7. The background activity and responses to Brush and Pressure of all five STT cells recorded in the superficial laminae increased after repeated testing. The background activity of five STT cells recorded in the nucleus proprius also increased, but the responses of only three of the cells to Brush and Pressure increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Zhang and G. J. Giesler Jr
Response Characterstics of Spinothalamic Tract Neurons That Project to the Posterior Thalamus in Rats
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2552 - 2564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. B. Peng, Q. D. Ling, M. A. Ruda, and D. R. Kenshalo
Electrophysiological Changes in Adult Rat Dorsal Horn Neurons After Neonatal Peripheral Inflammation
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 73 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Zhang, H. N. Wenk, C. N. Honda, and G. J. Giesler Jr.
Locations of Spinothalamic Tract Axons in Cervical and Thoracic Spinal Cord White Matter in Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2869 - 2880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. D. Al-Chaer, Y. Feng, and W. D. Willis
Comparative Study of Viscerosomatic Input Onto Postsynaptic Dorsal Column and Spinothalamic Tract Neurons in the Primate
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1876 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online