JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 68: 673-691, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Humphrey, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saul, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Humphrey, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saul, A. B.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 3 673-691, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Action of brain stem reticular afferents on lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

A. L. Humphrey and A. B. Saul
Department of Neurobiology, Anatomy, and Cell Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania 15261.

1. The A-laminae of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) contain two distinct groups of relay neurons: lagged and nonlagged cells. The groups differ in the pattern, timing, and amplitude of response to flashing spots. At spot onset, nonlagged cells discharge at short latency with an excitatory transient; in lagged cells this transient is supplanted by an inhibitory dip and a delayed latency to discharge. At spot offset, lagged cell discharge decays more slowly than in nonlagged cells. Here we have investigated the facilitatory influence of the brain stem reticular formation on the response properties of lagged X-cells (XL) and nonlagged X- and Y-cells (XN and YN). We were particularly interested in whether the inhibitory dip and sluggish response of lagged cells could be reversed during brain stem activation and the cells induced to respond like nonlagged cells. The peribrachial region (PB) of the pontine reticular formation was stimulated electrically with the use of 1,100-ms-long pulse trains that were paired with flashing spot stimuli. 2. Stimulation of PB led to an increase in the amplitude of visually evoked discharge in lagged and nonlagged cells. Compared with their response to spot stimulation alone, the average PB-evoked increase in mean discharge rate was greater than 50% in both groups. The mean discharge rate during PB plus spot stimulation was somewhat higher for XN-cells than for YN- and XL-cells, reflecting the relatively higher discharge rate among XN-cells during spot stimulation alone. 3. Two measures of response timing characterize lagged and nonlagged cells: latency to half-maximal discharge at spot onset (half rise) and latency to half-minimal discharge at spot offset (half fall). Among XN- and YN-cells, PB stimulation had no significant effect on these two latencies; among XL-cells, both latencies were reduced by 43 and 35%, respectively, on average. 4. During spot stimulation alone, all lagged cells were distinguishable from all nonlagged cells in having half-rise and half-fall latencies greater than 60 ms. Despite the reduction among XL-cells in these 2 latencies during PB stimulation, all but 2 of the 40 XL-cells maintained laggedlike latencies. The majority (95%) of XL-cells remained unambiguously lagged on these measures during brain stem stimulation. 5. During spot stimulation alone, 30 of 40 XL-cells tested displayed a prominent and often long-lasting inhibitory dip in discharge starting approximately 45 ms after spot onset. During PB stimulation only three cells lost the dip.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Augustinaite and P. Heggelund
Changes in firing pattern of lateral geniculate neurons caused by membrane potential dependent modulation of retinal input through NMDA receptors
J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 297 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. A Castro-Alamancos
Different temporal processing of sensory inputs in the rat thalamus during quiescent and information processing states in vivo
J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 567 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Properties of Primary Sensory (Lemniscal) Synapses in the Ventrobasal Thalamus and the Relay of High-Frequency Sensory Inputs
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 946 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Azouz and C. M. Gray
Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of Cortical Neurons In Vivo
J. Neurosci., March 15, 1999; 19(6): 2209 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. L. Humphrey, A. B. Saul, and J. C. Feidler
Strobe Rearing Prevents the Convergence of Inputs With Different Response Timings Onto Area 17 Simple Cells
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 3005 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online