Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 3 711-725, Copyright © 1992 by APS

ARTICLES

Relationship between receptive and dendritic field size of amacrine cells in the rabbit retina

S. A. Bloomfield
Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Medical Center, New York 10016.

1. Intracellular recordings were obtained from 40 amacrine cells in the isolated, superfused retina eyecup of the rabbit. Cells were subsequently labeled with horseradish peroxidase for morphological identification. Many of these cells displayed dendritic morphology consistent with that of amacrine cells described in prior anatomic studies, including starburst, A17, AII, and DAPI-3 cells. 2. The center receptive field of amacrine cells was measured with a 50- or 95-microns-wide, 6.0-mm-long rectangular slit of light that was displaced along its minor axis (parallel to the visual streak) in increments as small as 3 microns. The extent of the receptive field was calculated as the total distance over which the displaced slit could evoke a center response. Area summation of amacrine cells was measured with concentric spots of light with increasing diameters centered over the cell. 3. For a single amacrine cell, the receptive field size was comparable to the extent of its dendritic arbor. For the total population of amacrine cells, there was a strong, linear relationship between receptive field and dendritic field size. The receptive fields were, on average, 27% larger than the corresponding dendritic arbors, but this discrepancy can be accounted for entirely by tissue shrinkage associated with histological processing and a small imprecision of the light stimuli. Area summation measurements were consistent with those of receptive fields and were also related linearly to the dendritic field size of cells. 4. These findings indicate that even when the slit of light was placed at the distal edges of the dendritic arbor, synaptic inputs activated there were propagated effectively to the soma and recorded by microelectrodes placed there. In addition, amacrine cells were capable of summating synaptic inputs distributed throughout the entire arbor. 5. These results are inconsistent with the findings of prior computational modeling studies of passive, dendritic current flow in A17 and starburst amacrine cells that synaptic inputs on distal dendritic branches are isolated electrically from the soma and that these branches form autonomous, functional subunits. 6. The majority of amacrine cells encountered displayed light-evoked and/or spontaneous action potentials. These action potentials often took the form of high-amplitude somatic and low-amplitude dendritic spikes. On average, spiking amacrine cells showed considerably larger dendritic fields than nonspiking amacrine cells. In fact, all amacrine cells with arbors greater than 436 microns, which formed 45% of the total population, displayed spike activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Petit-Jacques and S. A. Bloomfield Synaptic Regulation of the Light-Dependent Oscillatory Currents in Starburst Amacrine Cells of the Mouse Retina J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 993 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Gavrikov, J. E. Nilson, A. V. Dmitriev, C. L. Zucker, and S. C. Mangel From the Cover: Dendritic compartmentalization of chloride cotransporters underlies directional responses of starburst amacrine cells in retina PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18793 - 18798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Ackert, S. H. Wu, J. C. Lee, J. Abrams, E. H. Hu, I. Perlman, and S. A. Bloomfield Light-induced changes in spike synchronization between coupled ON direction selective ganglion cells in the mammalian retina. J. Neurosci., April 19, 2006; 26(16): 4206 - 4215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Warrier, S. Borges, D. Dalcino, C. Walters, and M. Wilson Calcium From Internal Stores Triggers GABA Release From Retinal Amacrine Cells J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4196 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Ozaita, J. Petit-Jacques, B. Volgyi, C. S. Ho, R. H. Joho, S. A. Bloomfield, and B. Rudy A Unique Role for Kv3 Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels in Starburst Amacrine Cell Signaling in Mouse Retina J. Neurosci., August 18, 2004; 24(33): 7335 - 7343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Gavrikov, A. V. Dmitriev, K. T. Keyser, and S. C. Mangel Cation-chloride cotransporters mediate neural computation in the retina PNAS, December 23, 2003; 100(26): 16047 - 16052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Djupsund, T. Furukawa, S. Yasui, and M. Yamada Asymmetric Temporal Properties in the Receptive Field of Retinal Transient Amacrine Cells J. Gen. Physiol., September 29, 2003; 122(4): 445 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Hu and S. A. Bloomfield Gap Junctional Coupling Underlies the Short-Latency Spike Synchrony of Retinal {alpha} Ganglion Cells J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6768 - 6777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Vigh, E. Solessio, C. W. Morgans, and E. M. Lasater Ionic Mechanisms Mediating Oscillatory Membrane Potentials in Wide-Field Retinal Amacrine Cells J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 431 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Taylor and D. I. Vaney Diverse Synaptic Mechanisms Generate Direction Selectivity in the Rabbit Retina J. Neurosci., September 1, 2002; 22(17): 7712 - 7720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Volgyi, D. Xin, and S. A Bloomfield Feedback inhibition in the inner plexiform layer underlies the surround-mediated responses of AII amacrine cells in the mammalian retina J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 603 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Frech, J. Perez-Leon, H. Wassle, and K. H. Backus Characterization of the Spontaneous Synaptic Activity of Amacrine Cells in the Mouse Retina J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 1632 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Koizumi, S.-I. Watanabe, and A. Kaneko Persistent Na+ Current and Ca2+ Current Boost Graded Depolarization of Rat Retinal Amacrine Cells in Culture J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 1006 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Flores-Herr, D. A. Protti, and H. Wassle Synaptic Currents Generating the Inhibitory Surround of Ganglion Cells in the Mammalian Retina J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4852 - 4863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A Bloomfield and D. Xin Surround inhibition of mammalian AII amacrine cells is generated in the proximal retina J. Physiol., March 15, 2000; 523(3): 771 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Burkhardt and P. K. Fahey Contrast Rectification and Distributed Encoding By ON-OFF Amacrine Cells in the Retina J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1676 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Hartveit Reciprocal Synaptic Interactions Between Rod Bipolar Cells and Amacrine Cells in the Rat Retina J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2923 - 2936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. J. Zhou Direct Participation of Starburst Amacrine Cells in Spontaneous Rhythmic Activities in the Developing Mammalian Retina J. Neurosci., June 1, 1998; 18(11): 4155 - 4165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Sakai, H. Machuca, and K.-I. Naka Processing of Color- and Noncolor-Coded Signals in the Gourami Retina. II. Amacrine Cells J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1997; 78(4): 2018 - 2033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Devries and D. A. Baylor Mosaic Arrangement of Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields in Rabbit Retina J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1997; 78(4): 2048 - 2060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Jacoby, D. Stafford, N. Kouyama, and D. Marshak Synaptic Inputs to ON Parasol Ganglion Cells in the Primate Retina J. Neurosci., December 15, 1996; 16(24): 8041 - 8056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Yang and R. Masland Direct visualization of the dendritic and receptive fields of directionally selective retinal ganglion cells Science, December 18, 1992; 258(5090): 1949 - 1952. [Abstract] [PDF]