JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 68: 726-733, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Holley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Holley, A.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 3 726-733, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Some properties of receptive fields of olfactory mitral/tufted cells in the frog

T. Jiang and A. Holley
Laboratoire de Physiologie Neurosensorielle, Universite Claude-Bernard, CNRS (URA 180), Villeurbanne, France.

1. Different regions of the frog's olfactory epithelium were stimulated with nine glass micropipettes either individually or simultaneously in different combinations. The stimulus was a positive electrical pulse (4 s) consisting of a progressive increase, a plateau, and a progressive decrease in current intensity. Extra- and intracellular recordings were made from olfactory bulb mitral/tufted cells. Some of these cells were identified by intracellular injection of Lucifer yellow. 2. The action potential response patterns of mitral/tufted cells during the different phases of the stimulation were coded according to whether the activity was increased or decreased compared with its spontaneous level just before stimulation. Neural responses were classified into 11 types: individual neurons responded with different response types to stimuli delivered at different epithelial sites. On the basis of these response types, it was found that neurons could be classified into two groups. All response types in one group included an initial phase of increased discharge (excitation), whereas all types in the other group included an initial phase of decreased activity (suppression). Neurons that displayed response types belonging to one group never displayed those of the other group. It was thus concluded that a given neuron responded either always with an increased activity or always with a decreased activity, whatever the location of the stimulus. 3. The receptive field of a mitral/tufted cell appeared to be homogenous and not divided into areas of different properties, at least under the present experimental conditions. The extent of a receptive field was estimated by determining the number of effective epithelial sites (where an electrical stimulus evoked a response from a bulbar neuron).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Ma and G. Lowe
Action Potential Backpropagation and Multiglomerular Signaling in the Rat Vomeronasal System
J. Neurosci., October 20, 2004; 24(42): 9341 - 9352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. L. Fletcher and D. A. Wilson
Olfactory Bulb Mitral-Tufted Cell Plasticity: Odorant-Specific Tuning Reflects Previous Odorant Exposure
J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6946 - 6955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online