JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 68: 1160-1166, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amir, R.
Right arrow Articles by Devor, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amir, R.
Right arrow Articles by Devor, M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 4 1160-1166, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Axonal cross-excitation in nerve-end neuromas: comparison of A- and C-fibers

R. Amir and M. Devor
Department of Cell and Animal Biology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

1. We recorded from single afferent axons ending in chronic sciatic nerve end neuromas in rats with the use of the teased-fiber method. Axons were sought that had ongoing impulse discharge originating in the neuroma. 2. Recording from myelinated (A-) fibers, tetanic stimulation of neighboring axons (50 Hz, 5 or 10 s, intensity adequate to drive A-fibers) caused an increase, and sometimes a decrease, in the rate of ongoing discharge in 68% of the fibers tested. In addition, some initially silent neuroma A-fibers (1.4%) were activated in this way. Both A beta and A delta fibers responded, although the likelihood of response was greater in A beta fibers. We call this form of interfiber cross-excitation "crossed afterdischarge." 3. In contrast to A-fibers, crossed afterdischarge was evoked with these stimulation parameters in < or = 5% of the spontaneously active unmyelinated (C-) fibers sampled. No initially silent C-fibers were activated. 4. C-fibers remained largely insensitive to cross-excitation by neighboring axons even when the strength of stimulus pulses was increased so as to include neighboring A + C-fibers. 5. The difference between A- and C-fibers could not be accounted for on the basis of the maturity of the neuroma, rate and pattern of ongoing discharge, or use of Flaxedil paralysis. 6. The difference between A- and C-fibers is discussed in terms of two alternative mechanisms that may underlie crossed afterdischarge: mediation by a neurotransmitter(s) in a nonsynaptic mode, and mutual K+ depolarization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online