JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 68: 1613-1623, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riquimaroux, H.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riquimaroux, H.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 5 1613-1623, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Inactivation of the DSCF area of the auditory cortex with muscimol disrupts frequency discrimination in the mustached bat

H. Riquimaroux, S. J. Gaioni and N. Suga
Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130.

1. The Jamaican mustached bat uses a biosonar signal (pulse) with eight major components: four harmonics each consisting of a long constant frequency (CF1-4) component followed by a short frequency-modulated (FM1-4) component. While flying, the bat adjusts the frequency of its pulse so as to maintain the CF2 of the Doppler-shifted echo at a frequency to which its cochlea is very sharply tuned. This Doppler shift (DS) compensation likely is mediated or influenced by the Doppler-shifted CF (DSCF) processing area of the primary auditory cortex, which only represents frequencies in the range of echo CF2s (60.6 to 62.3 kHz when the "resting" frequency of the CF2 is 61.0 kHz). 2. We trained four bats to discriminate between different trains of paired tone bursts that mimicked a bat's pulse CF2 and the accompanying echo CF2. The frequency of these CF2s ranged between 61.0 and 64.0 kHz. A discriminated shock avoidance procedure response was employed using a leg flexion. For one stimulus, the S+, the pulse and echo CF2s were the same frequency (delta f = 0, i.e., no Doppler shift). A leg flexion during the S+ turned off both the S+ and the scheduled shock. For a second stimulus, the S-, the echo CF2 was 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 2.0 kHz higher than the pulse CF2. A delta f of 0.05 kHz was a frequency difference of 0.08%. No shock followed the S-, and leg flexions had no consequences. Correct responses consisted of a leg flexion during the S+ and no flexion during the S-; these responses were added together to compute the percentage of correct responses. When a bat correctly responded at better than 75% for all the delta f s, muscimol, a potent agonist of gamma-aminobutyric acid, was bilaterally applied to inactivate the DSCF area. Performance on each delta f discrimination was then measured. 3. Initial attempts to condition the bats to flex their legs to the CF tones mimicking part of the natural pulses and echoes failed. When broad-band noise bursts were substituted, however, the conditioned response was rapidly established. The noise band-width was gradually reduced and then replaced with the CF tones. Discrimination training with the tone burst trains then commenced. Throughout this procedure, the bats maintained their responding to the stimuli. The bats typically required approximately 20-30 sessions to perform consistently (> or = 75% correct responses) a discrimination involving a 2 kHz delta f.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
N. M. Weinberger
Associative representational plasticity in the auditory cortex: A synthesis of two disciplines
Learn. Mem., January 1, 2007; 14(1-2): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
U. Firzlaff, S. Schornich, S. Hoffmann, G. Schuller, and L. Wiegrebe
A Neural Correlate of Stochastic Echo Imaging
J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 785 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. A. Kalatsky, D. B. Polley, M. M. Merzenich, C. E. Schreiner, and M. P. Stryker
Fine functional organization of auditory cortex revealed by Fourier optical imaging
PNAS, September 13, 2005; 102(37): 13325 - 13330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Smotherman, S. Zhang, and W. Metzner
A Neural Basis for Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Pitch
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2003; 23(4): 1464 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online