JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 68: 1882-1894, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Picard, N.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Picard, N.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 5 1882-1894, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Primary motor cortical responses to perturbations of prehension in the monkey

N. Picard and A. M. Smith
Centre de Recherches en Sciences Neurologiques, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

1. Two monkeys were trained to grasp, lift, and hold an object within a vertical position window. A downward force-pulse perturbation was delivered during stationary object holding to simulate slip of the object due to gravity. The responses evoked by the perturbation were studied in 189 neurons of the hand area of the primary motor cortex. In addition, the slip-evoked responses were compared with the modulation of neural discharge with textures and weights described in the previous paper. 2. The perturbation evoked responses with sharp onsets in the majority of motor cortical neurons (115/189, 61%) active during the task. The majority of the responses were of sufficiently short latency (43.17 +/- 17.24 ms, mean +/- SD) to have participated in the reflex grip force increase that followed at latencies from 50 to 100 ms. 3. Although a similar proportion of neurons with cutaneous (43/70) or proprioceptive (35/59) receptive fields (RFs) were responsive to the perturbation, the cutaneous afferents provided a stronger excitation of motor cortical cells than the feedback originating from proprioceptive receptors. 4. The covariation of the neural discharge related to the surface texture of the grasped object and the responsiveness to object slip was studied in 89 cells tested with the perturbation and with more than one surface texture on unperturbed trials. Within this population, motor cortical cells with cutaneous RFs were more sensitive to the perturbation (25/31) than neurons receiving proprioceptive input (8/16). Furthermore, all (17/17) neurons with cutaneous RFs that were more active with the smooth than with the rough surface textures showed a vigorous response to the perturbation. 5. A detectable downward displacement of the object was not always necessary to excite neurons with cutaneous RFs and whose activity increased with the smooth textures. Their sensitivity to the perturbation was consistent with the hypothesis that the cutaneous afferent activity generated by object slips or shear forces on the skin contributed to the increased discharge when lifting objects of slippery surface textures. The activity of these slip- or shear-sensitive cells may have contributed to the reflex grip force increases and to the greater sustained muscular activity needed to lift smooth objects. 6. Ten cells that were excited by stroking of the glabrous skin of the hand decreased their discharge frequency during the task even though their RFs were in direct contact with the object. Most of these neurons (7/10) did not respond to the object slip, and three cells had very weak responses to the perturbation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Kourtis, H. F. Kwok, N. Roach, A. M. Wing, and P. Praamstra
Maintaining Grip: Anticipatory and Reactive EEG Responses to Load Perturbations
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. H. Ehrsson, A. Fagergren, G. O. Ehrsson, and H. Forssberg
Holding an Object: Neural Activity Associated With Fingertip Force Adjustments to External Perturbations
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1342 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. P. Gardner, J. Y. Ro, K. S. Babu, and S. Ghosh
Neurophysiology of Prehension. II. Response Diversity in Primary Somatosensory (S-I) and Motor (M-I) Cortices
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1656 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Jenmalm, C. Schmitz, H. Forssberg, and H. H. Ehrsson
Lighter or Heavier Than Predicted: Neural Correlates of Corrective Mechanisms during Erroneously Programmed Lifts.
J. Neurosci., August 30, 2006; 26(35): 9015 - 9021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. M. Friel, S. Barbay, S. B. Frost, E. J. Plautz, D. M. Hutchinson, A. M. Stowe, N. Dancause, E. V. Zoubina, B. M. Quaney, and R. J. Nudo
Dissociation of Sensorimotor Deficits After Rostral Versus Caudal Lesions in the Primary Motor Cortex Hand Representation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1312 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Monzee and A. M. Smith
Responses of Cerebellar Interpositus Neurons to Predictable Perturbations Applied to an Object Held in a Precision Grip
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1230 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Fagergren, O. Ekeberg, and H. Forssberg
Control Strategies Correcting Inaccurately Programmed Fingertip Forces: Model Predictions Derived From Human Behavior
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 2904 - 2916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M.-J. Boudreau, T. Brochier, M. Pare, and A. M. Smith
Activity in Ventral and Dorsal Premotor Cortex in Response to Predictable Force-Pulse Perturbations in a Precision Grip Task
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1067 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M.-J. Boudreau and A. M. Smith
Activity in Rostral Motor Cortex in Response to Predictable Force-Pulse Perturbations in a Precision Grip Task
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1079 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Naito, H. H. Ehrsson, S. Geyer, K. Zilles, and P. E. Roland
Illusory Arm Movements Activate Cortical Motor Areas: A Positron Emission Tomography Study
J. Neurosci., July 15, 1999; 19(14): 6134 - 6144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. I. Receptive Fields and Discharge Patterns
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 825 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. II. Responses to Object Texture and Weights
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 835 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. III. Responses to Altered Friction Perturbations
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 845 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Cadoret and A. M. Smith
Comparison of the Neuronal Activity in the SMA and the Ventral Cingulate Cortex During Prehension in the Monkey
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 153 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online