JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 68: 2147-2164, 1992;
0022-3077/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimmig, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimmig, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, U.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 6 2147-2164, Copyright © 1992 by APS


ARTICLES

Effects of stationary textured backgrounds on the initiation of pursuit eye movements in monkeys

H. G. Kimmig, F. A. Miles and U. Schwarz
Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

1. The initial ocular pursuit of small target spots (0.25 degrees diam) that suddenly start to move at constant speed (ramps) was recorded in four rhesus monkeys with the electromagnetic search coil technique. All target motions were horizontal, and both eyes were monitored. 2. In agreement with the observations of Keller and Khan, stationary textured backgrounds substantially reduced the initial eye acceleration achieved during pursuit but did not affect its latency. Correlation techniques were used to assess the changes in the eye speed profiles and indicated that the reduction in eye acceleration due to the background was a linear function of the logarithm of target speed over the range investigated (5-40 degrees/s), averaging 60% with the fastest targets. 3. Selectively excluding the background texture from the path of the target with a horizontal strip of card (vertical width, 4 degrees) reduced the impact of the background only slightly, and, even when the vertical width of the card was increased to 60 degrees, the effect of the background was not entirely eliminated. Thus the effect involves regions of the visual field well beyond the target and is not due simply to the reduced physical salience (contrast) of the target spot. Such spatially remote interactions suggest that the neurons decoding the target's motion have very extensive visual receptive fields. 4. Textured backgrounds also caused similar reductions in the eye acceleration during initial pursuit when, before the ramps, the fixated target spots stepped forward, i.e., stepped in the direction of the subsequent ramps (step ramps). In this situation, as with no steps, initial target ramps were foveofugal. When the fixated target spots were stepped back before moving forward so that initial target ramps were foveopetal, textured backgrounds now also delayed the onset of pursuit, and the reductions in eye acceleration were not seen until some time later when tracking resulted from foveofugal target-ramp motion. Selectively excluding the texture from the path of the target with a narrow strip of card eliminated any delays in the onset of pursuit to step ramps, but the later reductions in eye acceleration were still evident. These step-ramp data indicate that the mechanisms decoding foveofugal and foveopetal target ramps differ markedly in their sensitivity to textured backgrounds. That backgrounds can influence the latency and the initial eye acceleration independently is consistent with the idea that there are independent trigger and drive mechanisms for the decoding of target motions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Spering and K. R. Gegenfurtner
Contextual Effects on Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1353 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. A. Tarnutzer, S. Ramat, D. Straumann, and D. S. Zee
Pursuit Responses to Target Steps During Ongoing Tracking
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1266 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. V. Barthelemy, I. Vanzetta, and G. S. Masson
Behavioral Receptive Field for Ocular Following in Humans: Dynamics of Spatial Summation and Center-Surround Interactions
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3712 - 3726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Kodaka, K. Miura, K. Suehiro, A. Takemura, and K. Kawano
Ocular Tracking of Moving Targets: Effects of Perturbing the Background
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2474 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Kornylo, N. Dill, M. Saenz, and R. J. Krauzlis
Canceling of Pursuit and Saccadic Eye Movements in Humans and Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 2984 - 2999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
Y. KODAKA, S. CHIMOTO, and K. KAWANO
Neuronal Activity in Monkey Cortical Area 6 during the Initial Phase of Smooth Pursuit against a Stationary Background
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2002; 956(1): 460 - 463.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
R. J. Krauzlis, A. Z. Zivotofsky, and F. A. Miles
Target Selection for Pursuit and Saccadic Eye Movements in Humans
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 1999; 11(6): 641 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online