Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 68, Issue 6 2222-2236, Copyright © 1992 by APS

ARTICLES

Purkinje cell complex and simple spike changes during a voluntary arm movement learning task in the monkey

C. L. Ojakangas and T. J. Ebner
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

1. To evaluate the role of the cerebellum during improvement of voluntary motor performance over time, the discharge of 88 Purkinje cells in the intermediate and lateral cerebellum of two primates (Macaca mulatta) was investigated during a motor learning task involving visually guided arm movements. The animals were trained to move a draftsman's style manipulandum over a horizontally placed video screen. The animals were required to move a cursor from the start box to one of four target boxes by movement of the manipulandum. Errors were introduced into the movement by altering the visual feedback loop, changing the gain between the cursor movement and the hand movement. When a novel gain was presented over 100-200 movement trials, the animals adapted the movements to the new gain. The animals used a strategy of scaling the amplitude and velocity of the initial phase of the movement while keeping the time to peak velocity constant. 2. The learning paradigm consisted of an initial control phase with 35-100 trials at the gain of 1.0. The next 100-200 trials, the learning phase, were presented at one of four gains (0.6, 0.75, 1.5, 2.0). Lastly, a testing phase involved 80% of 100 trials at the learned gain and 20% of the trials randomly interspersed at the control gain of 1.0. An additional "distance control" was used in most experiments to control for the movement scaling associated with learning. In this series of movements using a gain of 1.0, the target box was placed at the distance and direction the hand would have to move in the adapted state. Two aspects of the kinematics were the same for the distance control and the movement at the learned gain: movement amplitude and time to peak velocity. There were, however, slight differences in the peak velocity attained. For gains < 1.0, the peak velocity of the learned task was 14-20% lower than the distance controls, and for gains > 1.0, it was 10-18% higher. 3. After implantation of chronic unit recording hardware, Purkinje cell simple and complex spike discharge was recorded extracellularly during the learning task. The cells were located primarily in the ipsilateral intermediate zone or nearby hemisphere of lobules V and VI. Simple and complex spike histograms, as well as averages of the hand displacement and velocity profiles, were calculated for each phase of the paradigm. To determine the time course of any changes, the learning trials were subdivided into three equal phases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. M. Bays and D. M. Wolpert Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability J. Physiol., January 15, 2007; 578(2): 387 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Soetedjo and A. F. Fuchs Complex spike activity of purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis during behavioral adaptation of monkey saccades. J. Neurosci., July 19, 2006; 26(29): 7741 - 7755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Mason, C. M. Hendrix, and T. J. Ebner Purkinje Cells Signal Hand Shape and Grasp Force During Reach-to-Grasp in the Monkey J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 144 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. V. Roitman, S. Pasalar, M. T. V. Johnson, and T. J. Ebner Position, Direction of Movement, and Speed Tuning of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells during Circular Manual Tracking in Monkey J. Neurosci., October 5, 2005; 25(40): 9244 - 9257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Norris, B. Greger, E. N. Hathaway, and W. T. Thach Purkinje Cell Spike Firing in the Posterolateral Cerebellum: Correlation With Visual Stimulus, Oculomotor Response, and Error Feedback J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1867 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Krakauer, M.-F. Ghilardi, M. Mentis, A. Barnes, M. Veytsman, D. Eidelberg, and C. Ghez Differential Cortical and Subcortical Activations in Learning Rotations and Gains for Reaching: A PET Study J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 924 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Liu, E. Robertson, and R. C. Miall Neuronal Activity Related to the Visual Representation of Arm Movements in the Lateral Cerebellar Cortex J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 1223 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I-h. Chou and S. G. Lisberger Spatial Generalization of Learning in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements: Implications for the Coordinate Frame and Sites of Learning J. Neurosci., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 4728 - 4739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Hartmann and J. M. Bower Tactile Responses in the Granule Cell Layer of Cerebellar Folium Crus IIa of Freely Behaving Rats J. Neurosci., May 15, 2001; 21(10): 3549 - 3563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kahlon and S. G. Lisberger Changes in the Responses of Purkinje Cells in the Floccular Complex of Monkeys After Motor Learning in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2945 - 2960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Lang and A. J. Bastian Cerebellar Subjects Show Impaired Adaptation of Anticipatory EMG During Catching J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2108 - 2119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Coltz, M. T. V. Johnson, and T. J. Ebner Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Discharge Encodes Movement Velocity in Primates during Visuomotor Arm Tracking J. Neurosci., March 1, 1999; 19(5): 1782 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.T.V. Johnson, J. D. Coltz, M. C. Hagen, and T. J. Ebner Visuomotor Processing as Reflected in the Directional Discharge of Premotor and Primary Motor Cortex Neurons J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 875 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Schultz Predictive Reward Signal of Dopamine Neurons J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 1 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-J. Wang, Y. Shimansky, V. Bracha, and J. R. Bloedel Effects of Cerebellar Nuclear Inactivation on the Learning of a Complex Forelimb Movement in Cats J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2447 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q.-G. Fu, D. Flament, J. D. Coltz, and T. J. Ebner Relationship of Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Discharge to Movement Kinematics in the Monkey J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 478 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Jueptner, C. D. Frith, D. J. Brooks, R.S.J. Frackowiak, and R. E. Passingham Anatomy of Motor Learning. II. Subcortical Structures and Learning by Trial and Error J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1325 - 1337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Kleim, K. Vij, D. H. Ballard, and W. T. Greenough Learning-Dependent Synaptic Modifications in the Cerebellar Cortex of the Adult Rat Persist for at Least Four Weeks J. Neurosci., January 15, 1997; 17(2): 717 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L M Parsons, J M Bower, J H Gao, J Xiong, J Li, and P T Fox Lateral cerebellar hemispheres actively support sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Learn. Mem., January 1, 1997; 4(1): 49 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]