JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 69: 474-481, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trulsson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trulsson, M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 2 474-481, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Multiple-tooth receptive fields of single human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents

M. Trulsson
Department of Physiology, University of Umea, Sweden.

1. Single-unit impulse activity from 25 mechanoreceptive afferents was recorded in the human inferior alveolar nerve using tungsten microelectrodes. All of these afferents were considered to originate in periodontal receptors because they showed responses to mechanical stimulation of one or more teeth but not to stimulation of the gingiva. 2. For each afferent isolated, forces with "ramp-and-hold"-shaped profiles of similar magnitudes (261 +/- 21 mN, mean +/- SD) were applied to the incisors, the canine, and the first premolar on the recording side, and the contralateral central incisor in four horizontal directions: lingual, labial, mesial, and distal. For a few of the afferents, forces were also applied in the axial directions (up and down). Both static and dynamic response components were analyzed. 3. For about one half of the tested afferents, the receptive fields were restricted to a single tooth. The remainder (52%) responded to stimulation of a group of teeth (on average 3.1 teeth), which typically showed contact between their crowns. 4. Afferents responding to loading of multiple teeth showed their strongest responses to forces applied to a particular tooth, with a gradual decline in the responsiveness to the adjacent teeth. 5. The stimulation directions eliciting the strongest afferent responses for the most sensitive tooth were approximately evenly distributed over the four stimulation directions, except for some bias toward the lingual direction. In contrast, loading of the adjacent teeth most often showed the strongest responses in the mesial or distal directions, in most cases toward the most sensitive tooth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. E. Johnsen and M. Trulsson
Encoding of Amplitude and Rate of Tooth Loads by Human Periodontal Afferents From Premolar and Molar Teeth
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1889 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
D.A. Ettlin, H. Zhang, K. Lutz, T. Jarmann, D. Meier, L.M. Gallo, L. Jancke, and S. Palla
Cortical Activation Resulting from Painless Vibrotactile Dental Stimulation Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2004; 83(10): 757 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. E. Johnsen and M. Trulsson
Receptive Field Properties of Human Periodontal Afferents Responding to Loading of Premolar and Molar Teeth
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 1478 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Trulsson and G. K. Essick
Low-Threshold Mechanoreceptive Afferents in the Human Lingual Nerve
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1997; 77(2): 737 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online