JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 69: 658-668, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. V.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 3 658-668, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of single hamster parabrachial neurons to binary taste mixtures: mutual suppression between sucrose and QHCl

M. B. Vogt and D. V. Smith
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267.

1. Although taste experience typically arises from a mixture of gustatory stimuli, nearly all previous neurophysiological studies of the mammalian central gustatory system have focused on responses to single chemical stimuli. To begin to systematically examine CNS responses to taste mixtures, we recorded the extracellular activity of single third-order neurons in the hamster PbN to anterior tongue stimulation with binary mixtures of sucrose and QHCl. In experiment 1, neurons were tested with four concentrations of sucrose (0.001, 0.01, and 1.0 M) presented alone and mixed with 0.1 M QHCl. In experiment 2, neurons were tested with four concentrations of QHCl (0.00032, 0.0032, 0.032, and 0.1 M) presented alone and mixed with 1.0 M sucrose. 2. The response to each binary mixture was compared with the response to the more effective component (MEC) presented alone, and those that differed by more than a selected criterion (based on response variability) were identified. Of all mixture responses, 37% (59/158) involved mixture suppression (mixture response < MEC response), only 4% (6/158) were greater than the MEC, and 59% (94/158) were classified as not different than the response to the MEC. Most neurons that displayed mixture suppression did so at several mixture concentrations. 3. Sucrose suppression (mixture response < sucrose response) was prevalent among neurons most responsive to sucrose and for the mixtures that contained the stronger sucrose concentrations. Among neurons that displayed sucrose suppression, the magnitude of suppression was significantly correlated with sucrose response magnitude but not with QHCl response magnitude. These and other factors suggest that a neuron's capacity to display sucrose suppression to sucrose+QHCl mixtures is related to its sucrose sensitivity. 4. QHCl suppression (mixture response < QHCl response) was less prevalent than sucrose suppression, and the neurons that displayed QHCl suppression were almost exclusively a subset of those that displayed sucrose suppression to the same or different mixtures. This finding and the observation that one-third of all mixture responses involved mutual suppression (response to the mixture less than that to either component alone), suggest an association between the factors underlying sucrose suppression and QHCl suppression. 5. The across-neuron patterns (ANPs) of taste responses, which are thought to represent taste quality, were compared for mixtures and components. In general, the ANP for each mixture was similar to (significantly correlated with) the ANP of the more stimulatory component. However, for the mixture that evoked the greatest sucrose suppression, the mixture ANP was more similar to the ANP of the less stimulatory component.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-Y. Chen and P. M. Di Lorenzo
Responses to Binary Taste Mixtures in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract: Neural Coding With Firing Rate
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2144 - 2157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. Talavera, K. Yasumatsu, R. Yoshida, R. F. Margolskee, T. Voets, Y. Ninomiya, and B. Nilius
The taste transduction channel TRPM5 is a locus for bitter-sweet taste interactions
FASEB J, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1343 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
A. C. Spector and S. P. Travers
The representation of taste quality in the Mammalian nervous system.
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, September 1, 2005; 4(3): 143 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. V. Smith, M.-K. Ye, and C.-S. Li
Medullary Taste Responses are Modulated by the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis
Chem Senses, June 1, 2005; 30(5): 421 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C.-S. Li, Y. K. Cho, and D. V. Smith
Modulation of Parabrachial Taste Neurons by Electrical and Chemical Stimulation of the Lateral Hypothalamus and Amygdala
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1183 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
K. Hasegawa, S. Otawa, I. Ikeda, and H. Ogawa
Responsiveness of the Cortical Taste Area Neurons to a Mixture of the Four Basic Tastants in Rats
Chem Senses, February 1, 2003; 28(2): 131 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C.-S. Li, Y. K. Cho, and D. V. Smith
Taste Responses of Neurons in the Hamster Solitary Nucleus Are Modulated by the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 2979 - 2992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. H. Lemon and P. M. Di Lorenzo
Effects of Electrical Stimulation of the Chorda Tympani Nerve on Taste Responses in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2477 - 2489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. B. Halsell and S. P. Travers
Anterior and Posterior Oral Cavity Responsive Neurons Are Differentially Distributed Among Parabrachial Subnuclei in Rat
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 920 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C.-S. Li and D. V. Smith
Glutamate Receptor Antagonists Block Gustatory Afferent Input to the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1514 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online