JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 69: 1314-1322, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fan, T. X.
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fan, T. X.
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 4 1314-1322, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Visual-response properties of units in the turtle cerebellar granular layer in vitro

T. X. Fan, A. F. Rosenberg and M. Ariel
Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.

1. Single units were recorded extracellularly in the turtle's cerebellar cortex from an isolated brain preparation during visual stimulation. Only a small fraction of the isolated units responded to visual stimuli. For these visually responsive units, the most effective visual stimulus was a moving check pattern that covered the entire surface of the retinal eyecup. The visually responsive units had little or no spontaneous spike activity, nor were they driven by flashes of diffuse light or stationary patterns. 2. All the visually responsive units were direction sensitive and were driven exclusively by the contralateral eye. This direction tuning was well fit by a limacon model (mean correlation coefficient, 0.89). The distribution of the entire sample indicates a slight preponderance of upward preferred directions. 3. The direction tuning of these cerebellar units was independent of stimulus contrast or the pattern's configuration (such as checkerboards or random check or dot patterns). In the preferred direction, a unit's spike frequency increased monotonically as a function of stimulus velocity until approximately 10 degrees/s, but remained direction sensitive (relative to the opposite direction) at speeds as fast as 100 degrees/s. 4. In some experiments the ventrocaudal brain stem was transected in the frontal plane just caudal to the cerebellar peduncles. Although this lesion presumably removes climbing fiber input from the inferior olivary nuclei, the visual-response properties in the cerebellar cortex were unaffected. 5. The response properties of these units indicate that they encode retinal slip information in the cerebellum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie
Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Ariel
Latencies of Climbing Fiber Inputs to Turtle Cerebellar Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1042 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. Kogo, D. M. Rubio, and M. Ariel
Direction Tuning of Individual Retinal Inputs to the Turtle Accessory Optic System
J. Neurosci., April 1, 1998; 18(7): 2673 - 2684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online