JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 69: 1323-1330, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, T. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, T. X.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 4 1323-1330, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Electrophysiological evidence for a bisynaptic retinocerebellar pathway

M. Ariel and T. X. Fan
Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15260.

1. Electrical microstimulation was applied to an in vitro turtle brain preparation while recording extracellular activity from the cerebellar cortex. A visual input to the cerebellum was investigated by measuring spike responses evoked by stimulation of drifting visual patterns imaged onto the contralateral retinal eyecup. A vestibular input was assessed by extracellular field potentials following brief current pulses through monopolar suction electrodes holding the eighth cranial nerve (nVIII). 2. The cortical topography of visual and vestibular inputs was first examined. Visual units and vestibular fields show considerable topographic overlap in the rostrolateral quadrant of the cerebellum. In addition, granule layer units were isolated that responded to current stimulation of nVIII (60-150 microA monopolar). In some cases, spikes occurred at short and fixed latency after each current pulse for stimulus frequencies of 100 Hz. The responses of these units suggest a direct path between the stimulating and recording electrodes without intervening synapses. Alternatively, extracellular units were also encountered that responded with longer, more variable latencies but only for low stimulation frequencies (< or = 20 Hz). Of the units that responded to nVIII stimulation, three units also responded to visual stimuli, yet those units all failed to follow high-frequency stimulation of nVIII. This cortical area may then be a site for convergence of visual and vestibular signals on postsynaptic cells. 3. The cellular identity of the visual units in the granule layer and the visual pathways leading there were next investigated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie
Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Ariel
Latencies of Climbing Fiber Inputs to Turtle Cerebellar Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1042 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online